One of the prime reasons for the state creating Broadband Infraco was that it would [supposedly] break the monopoly Telkom has on providing infrastructure and wholesale services. Broadband Infraco would also take over some of the assets that were originally earmarked for second national operator Neotel, namely those from the Eskom-owned Easitel and Transnet-owned Transtel.
Neotel stated before Parliament the creation of Broadband Infraco would impact its business case. However, the two entities have since established a close working relationship with Neotel having a five year contract to market Broadand Infraco's services.
SHOOT: Why does the state need to create an organ to break a monopoly it perpetuated, and do so by flouting its own legislation, speedtracking the license process etc? Why not just leave it to the market to fill this gap? Because people in government are profiteering off the artificial market conditions they have manipulated into place, conditions that have hurt and constrained this industry for many years.
Neotel stated before Parliament the creation of Broadband Infraco would impact its business case. However, the two entities have since established a close working relationship with Neotel having a five year contract to market Broadand Infraco's services.
SHOOT: Why does the state need to create an organ to break a monopoly it perpetuated, and do so by flouting its own legislation, speedtracking the license process etc? Why not just leave it to the market to fill this gap? Because people in government are profiteering off the artificial market conditions they have manipulated into place, conditions that have hurt and constrained this industry for many years.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment