The Supreme Court had to grapple with the Bill of Rights' most puzzling item. The Amendment reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - TIME.com
SHOOT: 'The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.' I take it people without guns are going to threaten those with guns and then those with guns have a right to shoot to protect that right. Sounds very civilised.
SHOOT: 'The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.' I take it people without guns are going to threaten those with guns and then those with guns have a right to shoot to protect that right. Sounds very civilised.
The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision overturning Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban is the biggest gun rights ruling since the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791. The Court had not waded into this divisive issue since 1939, when it declared, "We cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear" arms. But on Thursday the Court broke its silence to do just that, ruling for the first time that the Constitution confers an individual right to gun ownership beyond providing for "a well regulated Militia," as the amendment states. The Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home," Justice Antonin Scalia, the court's arch-conservative, wrote in the majority opinion. "Until today, it has been understood that legislatures may regulate the civilian use and misuse of firearms so long as they do not interfere with the preservation of a well-regulated militia," Stevens wrote. |
No comments:
Post a Comment