SHOOT: The timing of the hacked emails is very convenient to those who would prefer that climate change efforts be abandoned.
clipped from blog.newsweek.com Do the hacked e-mails undermine the case for anthropogenic climate change?
Do the e-mails indicate any unethical efforts to hide data that do not support the idea of anthropogenic global warming, or to keep contrary ideas out of the scientific literature and the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change reports? The contrarians or deniers do not have a scientific leg to stand on. Their aim is to win a public-relations battle, or at least get a draw, which may be enough to stymie the actions that are needed to stabilize climate. |
No comments:
Post a Comment