It's easy to get caught up in the sensationalized aspects of Semenya's tale, but let's not forget that she's still just a teenager who is now the centerpiece of an embarrassing worldwide scandal. No matter how things progressed to this point (and we'll get to that later), Semenya is a victim in this story.
But let's operate under assumption that the tests were accurate and that Semenya is a hermaphrodite. If so, then there are three main questions that will need to be answered soon:
1) Will be stripped of her gold medal?
Probably. It's hard to imagine that the IAAF would allow Semenya to keep the gold after what these tests reveal. The rules explicitly state that a "gender verification" situation has to be approved and overseen by medical authorities. Semenya didn't do this. Fair or not, a rule is a rule.
2) Will Semenya ever be allowed to run again?
Reading the IAAF rules, it would appear that Semenya would be allowed to run if her condition was treated. Whether or not she would want to is anyone's guess. But there's also a chance she could be banned from running based on the answer to the next question.
3) Who knew about this and when did they know?
We haven't gotten this far down the road yet, but the next logical step in the progression of this sordid affair is whether there was a coverup involved. Regardless of whether the intentions of Semenya and her handlers were nefarious, they had to know of her ambiguous gender. Not having ovaries isn't something that goes unnoticed. If they did, then at what point did this turn from an unfortunate medical situation into outright deception?
If Semenya was an innocent running without knowledge of her condition, then there's not much the IAAF could do other than strip her medal and advise her on how to regain eligibility. But if it can be determined that she knew she was running illegally (which would be tough to prove, but I'm starting to get the feeling that people knew -- how else would other coaches have known to order gender tests?) then there could be heavy sanctions down the road.
These questions will be discussed in the coming weeks and will be the center of attention when the IAAF officially releases its findings in November. If you thought the tale of Caster Semenya was strange before, it's just getting started.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Semenya: 3 questions that need to be asked, will be asked, but so far no one is asking
SHOOT: I hope this adds some sense and sensibility to what is a troublingly hyped up issue, according to the South Africans, about 'racism' and 'sexism'. Actually it's about something much simpler: is there an unfair advantage. It's a simple question, and the answer [which turns out to be 'Yes'] isn't as complicated or as loaded as many people are making out to be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Actually if you read about the condition, she doesn't have an unfair advantage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgen_insensitivity_syndrome
Androgen Insensitivity syndrom means that she is naturally resistant to the strength-promoting qualities of testosterone.
Instead on a very public stage she has discovered she is infertile with this genetic defect. Additionally any siblings now will have to check to see if she has the same problem, is a carrier, or normal.
The question is: does she/he have Androgen Insensitivity syndrome?
At a guess, I'd say no.
Post a Comment