Showing posts with label power of citizen media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label power of citizen media. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2009

How to lose an election, win it and then lose again [for real this time] #iranelection

SHOOT: One way to incur the ire of social media is to do one simple thing. Tell them: "Don't do that!" Or worse:"Don't say that." Once again, social media demonstrates here that it can be a force for good, and a powerful voice that doesn't go gently into the night. How do you shut down Facebook, Twitter, blogs... Answer? You can't. So governments had better learn to behave fairly on behalf of the people they claim to represent. Or else befuddle them with newsy propoganda (as is commonplace in the West). Example: Iraq is on the axis of evil/Iraq contains WMD's. Iran is looking like a sentient bunch, and that is great to see.
clipped from mashable.com
Iran Flag Image
Iran Twitter Protests Image
IranElection Protests Image

We’re approaching one billion tweets on the situation, if we haven’t passed that number already. Heck, it’s been 1% of all Twitter chatter, according to Twist. Here it is compared to iPhone chatter:

clipped from twist.flaptor.com
clipped from mashable.com

The Blogosphere: 2,250,000 Blog Posts in 24 hours

Iran Google Blog Image
Iran Google News Image

YouTube: 184,500 Videos on Iran, 3000 in One Day

Iran YouTube Protests Image

The Buzz Only Grows

While numbers can be off, these trends clearly demonstrate that social media has been front-and-center in the Iran election protests. The Iranian government has reportedly been trying to censor some of this communication, but clearly people are finding ways around it. While we know a great deal about what’s happening in Iran, we have almost no idea how it will affect the outcome. This may be the biggest question that remains to be answered.

HOW TO: Track Iran Election with Twitter and Social Media.
 blog it

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Citizen Journalism: CNN to launch iReport

This will be a video-centric site. For more background, go here.
To see CNN's promotion of iReport, go here.

Major news sites and blogs - well, some of them - are resembling each other more and more closely. What we're also seeing in branded web pages (from major media companies) that look almost no different to the sterile listings of aggregator pages. News is becoming vanilla, hence the necessity to ask these very real questions: who owns the news, who decides what is news, and what should be news?

Saturday, February 09, 2008

The End Of The World - brought to you by Citizen Journalists


Rob: Still filming?
Hud: Yeah, people are gonna want to know... how it all went down.


Cloverfield is an interesting flick if only in the sense that it demonstrates when systems crash on a large scale, resources are disrupted or no longer in place, and emergency systems - backups - then usurp the behemoths because micro-systems (a man and his phone)can operate on minimum level resources. Critically low capacities basically enable the 'citizen journalist' to begin to come into his/her own.

Hud: Rob, it is time to leave the electronic store.

In Cloverfield one scene is particularly noteworthy: all these looters are standing around in an electronics store watching CNN on plasma screens while outside, missiles and and plumes of dust fly into the air. At a certain point CNN is no longer there. Almost nothing remains.

Beth McIntyre: [sees monster] What is that?
Hud: It's a terrible thing.
[while trying to get to a flight of stairs, Rob encounters a parasite and kills it]
Beth McIntyre: Oh my God! What is that?
Hud: I don't know! Something else! Also terrible.



But future scenarios of war and intense degradation will probably not be broadcast on CNN or by any number of major networks. They will be captured on cellphones and the like, and broadcast on the internet - whatever is available - via VPNs, or through various forms of video and or radio streaming.

This will only happen when a tipping point is reached where people begin to find that large media companies can no longer represent/save them from what is happening on the ground where they are.

Hud: Okay, so, just to be clear here: our choices are we die in here, die in the subway, or die on the streets. That right?
Rob Hawkins: Yeah... that's about right.


To some extent - I sometimes think - this may already be true, we're just too distracted to notice.

Marlena Diamond: [as rats run through her feet in the subway] Oh god, this is nasty. This is disgusting.
Hud: They're all running in the same direction
Rob: Ya, like they're running away...
Lily Ford: From what?

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Citizen Active

Bobby Godsell's column in the latest Financial Mail echoes my sentiments exactly on the urgent need (and the reasons behind this) to transform passive consumers into activated citizens. There are so many issues vital to our interest as individuals part of the South African community. What are we doing about concerns? Do we know what to do or even where to start?

Read Spirit of 1994 for background.

Friday, February 01, 2008

Citizen Journalism: Is it a CB Radio or a Satellite Phone?

Remember CB Radios? Yes, they do exist even if it is a sort of second (third?) hand technology. Are they useful? Sure. Indispensable? Well, perhaps in very specialised scenarios like the Aussie Outback and the Karoo, but not much besides.

Someone in at a large media house (not this one, one based overseas) made the comment that Citizen Journalism is about as effective and useful and abundant as CB Radio. Is it? Or is it cutting edge, ultra-necessary and vital (as a satellite phone on Everest or the heart of Botswana).

There is a world of difference isn't there? In my opinion, right now, Citizen Journalism (CJ) is both. Some of it is edgy top class stuff, especially when it is a massive disaster, a terror attack, some Act of God. For the rest, where reporters must compete with Real reporters, one could argue that you get low quality for little/no pay. I think it is up to the content and platform owners to manage, coach and guide users towards being better reporters. They have the technology and often a little encouragement goes an awful long way...

What is happening to journalism?

And what is happening to the media's sense of mission?


When doing statistical analysis to find out what is popular on our websites, the results are often disturbing. The 'tabloid' news beats hard news hands down, every time; good 'documentary type'/hardcore news simply cannot compete with infotainment styled gossip/scandal. Standards have changed (some would say dropped) because of the pressure of profits, but also the broadening, the flattening of content into a 24/7 stream of infotainment from myriad sources.

The question is, who now decides what is news? Are we still providing a public service, or are we simply pandering to a public hungry to hear about Britney, Paris and a snake-bitten golfer?

Entertain and Teach

When I was a teacher in South Korea an old fogey once said: "I am NOT an entertainer." This guy was a highly qualified educator, and there had been complaints that his textbook approach was 'too boring'. I understood his point, but I also felt that he was fundamentally misguided in his approach. If you can't hold people's interest, no matter how important the thing is you're communicating, well you've lost already.

But there is certainly a crisis going on, and we all know that the internet is distracting a lot of eyeballs (and revenue) away from traditional media, and newspapers in particular.

Here's the rub: original reporting is what distinguishes newspapers and good news from second hand, second rate media. Original reporting is hard work, it requires effort, and passion. It is knocking on doors, pushing, chest beating work. It is also, often, highly local. It is uncovering, unearthing, a skelton in a neighbours garden. It is up close and personal, and we discover important insights about what is really happening in our community - how things are being run, what decision makers are really doing (compared to what they are saying) and so on. Now, with advertising revenues for newspapers contracting, there is less money for newspapers to spend on reporters, less money dedicated to the task of doing valuable hard nosed reporting. Which means that essentially the likes of Google and Yahoo (Yahoo is the biggest online News site in the world, followed by MSNBC) who are critically dependent on newspapers for their content are also, in a sense, the most critical saboteurs of the revenue stream of newspapers.

Less is More, More or Less

More and more revenue is being diverted away from newspapers, even though newspapers remain the key conduit, the fountainhead, for news. Radio, TV, and online content all tap in to news printed every day.

As a result of the dearth of content providers, and the public's participation in providing content (citizen journalism), quality, consistency and reliability is an ongoing issue. Once again original reporting distinguishes. There are plenty of sites that simply regurgitate or recycle [this blog suffers the same tendency]. Thus newspapers are finding their ownership of the news quickly usurped, and then disseminated at a fantastic speed. As such competition is levelling the playing field, bringing Media Providers face to face with this vital question: 'Should we give the public what it wants or what it ought to want, or ought to know?' The question can be rephrased: Who decides what is news? The editor, or the public? Is it an either or?

What is certain is that newspapers have in the past and must continue to provide a public service. It can be a difficult situation where a company is essentially providing a public service, but must answer to shareholders in terms of the fundamentals of private enterprise (bottom line revenues). Selling news is still a business after all, isn't it? Or have things shifted to the extent that with the internet and other technologies, we all have the capacity to know everything. Do we really need a single resource? The answer is we do, but possibly less than we did before. How much less is the question.

It is easy for news providers to make the mistake of covering big international stories (as seen on CNN, Sky and BBC and mirrored elsewhere). Once again, what distinguishes a newspaper or indeed any media is its attention, its sensitivity, the quality of its local context. To the extent that it can address and reflect and provide vital insights into a local context, to this extent the Media (or medium) becomes, and can become, indispensable.

Online

Online news is a challenge simply because the online viewer (I dislike the term user) is engaged in an entirely different approach/mindset to a person holding a newspaper. This is simply because, armed with a mouse, a viewer is super-connected to limitless digitised networks. It is very easy to match thinking with information on the web. It is easier by far to draw information towards you, rather than to page through something tangible, but static.

Think for example of someone looking for a job, or a house, or a car online, as opposed to someone having to wave through endless mismatches set out in document form. The one is simply a far more efficienct option.

The way online viewers consume news is highly accelarated, highly efficient, and highly spontaneous. The methodology is sometimes called infosnacking, or infochunking. The word conjures up a new ethos immediately, not based on necessarily wanting formulaic news, but a more personalised, more interesting mix that is in parts informative, entertaining and interesting, but most of all convenient. It's exactly what the viewer wants, and it's interactive.

My aim as a writer is to simply write stories (both here and for mass media) that taste good and are good for you.

For further background read this excellent article:
Journalism without journalists

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Blogging For Money



You can earn around R30 every time you Blog. It’s not a lot, but add it up and it can pay your cellphone bill, and if you’re disciplined, your gym membership fees too.

And another reason to consider citizen mediated websites is you are finding a wider audience for your pearls of wisdom, or pictures worth so many words. And you never who might pick up on these contributions, and where it might take you from there.

On the 20th of February 2006, having become an almost daily blogger for about a year, I submitted my first story (a motoring review) to Reporter.co.za – a citizen journalism website based entirely on user generated content. Since then I have submitted over 300 stories and hundreds of images. Do the math: that’s around R10 000 extra pocket money for stuff that was going on my blog anyway.

The Plot Thickens

Although none of my Nobel-worthy contributions* were snapped up by TIME or NEWSWEEK, I was asked to attend (all expenses paid) a blogging conference (representing Reporter.co.za), and there have been a number of soapie dramas that have spun out of the citizen media stuff. The most controversial articles included my attacks on Southern Free State Cycling (Free State Cycling a Shambles), and then the follow-up lambasting that went on at the cycling forum The Hub (breach of contract (to the value of about R8000).

The point is, even if you don’t want to rant, you can get money and attention for the sort of socially important, socially acceptable and particularly altruistic stuff you want people to take cognizance of.


International Coverage

There are not many citizen media sites that pay, but there are others. Ohmynews International pays more than Reporter, but they’re also stricter about quality and have far more people writing for them. It also helps to have a Korean bank account (as international cash transfers can eat into what you earn). I’ve submitted over 230 and earned – hold your breath – over W1.3 million. Relax, that’s about R10 000 over an extended length of time. But at W20 000 (R149) per story, you get rewarded for quality, and incidentally, being more ‘international’, they HAVE had contributors who’ve been picked up by TIME.

Video

Another site that you may not have heard of is Metacafe. It’s basically a You Tube-that-pays. It probably gets less stuff submitted, but it is certainly a site worth visiting. They pay you based on pay-per-view ($5 for every 1000 Views). If you think you can’t make money, ask the guys who walk away with $30 000 (some videos get over a million hits).

Local Blogs That Pay

Although I have not done this myself, I've heard that you can also earn money at MY DIGITAL LIfe - a South African site. MDL allows you to earn money based on hits to your content. Register, submit 10 stories (to gain 'author' status), and you get 10 cents for every hit.

Quality Control

The great thing about sending your content to these citizen media sites is that it controls the quality of what you’re doing in the reverse direction too. When you’re writing with an audience (and a possible income) in mind, I think there is a tad (and a vital tad) more discipline and afterthought involved. This is good news for the Blogosphere, which needs consciousness, and a few streaks of light – the lights of revelation, insight and activism (and not just vitriol, porn, rants and raving) to flow through it. In this sense the internet and blogs can begin to fulfill the promise and potential we once believed it had.

*My most popular story on Ohmynews received 14 498 hits, and was titled Why Insects Can't Fly Straight At Night.

To get involved in this process, in this intelligent conversation, register at reporter by clicking here.
Register at Ohmynews
here.
Register at Metacafe by clicking
here.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

The Best Blogs in South Africa


Image above is Erica Durance (Lois Lane in Smallville)
Web traffic aggregator Amatomu provides interesting insights into the South African blogosphere

What are the most popular blogs right now in South Africa? Amatomu.com ranks them (by reads) as follows:

1.keo.co.za
2.
sarugby.com
3.
Steve Hofmeyr’s Afrikaans Blog
4.
Myrugbynews.co.za
5.
So Close
6.
ECR Big Breakfast Blog
7.
East Coast Radio Newswatch Blog
8.
Marco’s Blog
9.
Tectonic
10.
Wired Gecko.

Do you want to get the inside scoop on, say, the rugby world cup. Visit the top Sports (and right now, most popular overall) blog, which is www.keo.co.za. Never heard of it? Well, it has plenty of the most up to date news and views on everything cricket and rugby.

Interestingly, this list of blogs includes a celebrity blog and a radio blog. Technology is also a popular topic. ‘So Close’ at number 5 is a blog about a woman who wants/wanted to have children.

Amatomu has various categories, and also ranks stories according to reads, posts, ‘schmaaks’ and inbound links. My blog (www.nickvanderleek.com) is a ‘News & Politics’ blog, although I don’t blog strictly to this definition. I have seen my ranking under this category climb from the late 20’s; now it has entered the late teens. I’m in the top 5 most popular blogs in my category (by posts).

I’ve also searched for the blog I love to hate, Mushypeasontoast, and it seems now that the blogosphere is growing, your content has to be pretty good to make it to the top. That’s great news. Mushy is presently 5th in the much overlooked Life section, with Steve Hofmeyr unassailably in front.

It’s fun to check how popular a wider audience finds your content, and it’s interesting to see the latest posts, and what’s hot, on Amatomu’s elegant site.

It’s also a great way to look at what communities are doing, how they are forming, and for bloggers to leave comments on sites that press their buttons, or rub them the wrong way. Check it out, and if you haven’t already, register and get your blog ranked and rated at Amatomu.com.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Capture the news on your cellphone

Become a part of the news reporting process with News24

Next time you witness something newsworthy that you think News24 Users would like to see, just snap a picture or a video on your cellphone camera and e-mail it or MMS it to photos@news24.com.

If it's a big scoop, we'll contact you immediately, get your details, and publish it live on News24.
You could also win big in our That's News to Me competition!

News24 Users have got into the swing of things already with these great galleries:

The big brrrr by Various News24 Users
Heavy rains in Cape Town by Various News24 Users
Fire in Stellenbosch by Various News24 Users
A UFO or a vapour trail? by Deon Williams
Armed robbery in Newlands by Various News24 Users
Shooting in Fourways Mall by Andre Raubenheimer
Bomb blast in Algiers bu Elies Belazouz
Mozambique demolition by Lorinda Steenkamp
Turmoil in Durban by Various News24 Users
The lunar eclipse by Various News24 Users

NVDL: You can do the same by submitting it to info@reporter.co.za and be paid for its published.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Time is key, but Unique Visitors still King

From Bizcommunity:
By Louise Marsland

The multi-media convergence of content online is producing new opportunities for advertising online and additional measurement options for publishers of content online. The future is clear: the internet is a growth medium globally for advertisers and once South Africa has proper high-speed broadband internet access, web access will explode locally. Will your brand be ready?

Speaking at the Online Publishers Association of South Africa seminar yesterday, Wednesday 26 September 2007, OPA chair and GM of the Mail & Guardian Online, Matthew Buckland, said with the future going digital, no brand could afford not to have an online advertising strategy.

While South African online publishers are still, frustratingly, having to educate clients and agencies alike about the power of the interactivity of online as a medium...they are, however, still implementing and investigating new technologies and applications to provide readers and advertisers with the best multi-medium and multi-platform options.

Buckland's future trends:

  • Multimedia ads: convergence of TV and online advertising.
  • Broadband: bigger ads, more creative rich media ads. Buckland doesn't believe the ad industry has been very creative online to date.
  • Profiling of users: behavioral targeted advertising.
  • More targeted advertising: less wastage, higher click through rates.
  • New types of content: advertising on UGC and niche audiences
  • Increasing home use: as broadband takes hold.
  • Globalisation: advertising local and international (ie, Facebook).
SA users are currently the sixth biggest on Facebook in terms of users globally. And there are SA advertisers on Facebook: "that's money flowing out the country", says Buckland. But the same works for SA publishers: they should be accepting international advertising.

Many content platforms: cellphones, Playstations, Internet-enabled fridges! "Content is being delivered to all Internet-enabled devices. Even the most sophisticated Internet fridge with a panel delivers advertising and you can download recipes; it will in the future be impossible to come across a digital device not connected to the Internet,"Buckland explained.

NVDL: Buckland goes on to posit the importance of TIME on site. Time spent online is key; we need to move away from measurement metrics of numbers to volume of activity.* Think of it as someone surfing through the channels of SABC or DSTV. How much time do they spend watching specific content from one service/content provider to the next? What are they watching the most? It’s important to differentiate online between the idea of a reader and viewer.

In order to measure reach and exposure of online advertising, measurement needs to delve deeper as different website visitors have different levels of activity, interest and engagement with your content and advertising*.

*From Bizcommunity

Monday, September 17, 2007

Current TV

TV
From Current TV:

Current is a global television network that gives you the opportunity to create and influence what airs on TV.

Current is about what's going on: stories from the real world, told by you.

We slice our schedule into short segments that we call "pods" — each just a few minutes long. You'll see profiles of interesting people on the rise, intelligence on trends as they spring up around us, and international news from new perspectives.

And much of it comes straight from you.
mobilize_your_life_B_alt-1
We call it viewer-created content, or VC2. Right now, VC2 makes up about a third of our channel — and that share is growing.

It works like this:

Anyone who wants to contribute can upload a video. Then, everyone in the Current online community helps decide what should be on TV. You can join in at either stage — watch & vote or make video. (We've also got online training to help you get the skills you need to make TV!)

This is definitely not a traditional TV network. Watching Current, you'll see more, on more topics, from more points of view.

But if we're going to succeed, we need you to do more than watch; we need you to jump in and participate.

Here are all the ways to get started:
Watch a sample of our TV programming
Check out our full schedule for a look at what's on TV
Dive into the Watch & Vote section
Meet others on our message boards
Read our FAQ for answers to more questions

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

New Citizen Media Website Starting in UK


Citizen Media

By the Project for Excellence in Journalism

James Carey, the esteemed Columbia University journalism professor who died in 2006, once wrote that journalism was essentially conversation among citizens. Communication was culture, he often said. It was creating a community “of conversationalists, of people who talk to one another, who resolve disputes with one another through talk,” he wrote in an essay titled “A Republic, If You Can Keep It.”

In 2006, citizen journalism continued to grow as part of online journalism. The terms have changed, from “zines,” to personal Web sites, to blogs, but they all share a common character — enthusiasm for people themselves creating, sharing and participating in the news of the day.

Citizen journalism, in other words, is a rediscovery of the essential truth Carey articulated years before the Internet was invented.

Throughout the year the pattern of citizens becoming pro-active participants in their own journalism continued to gain momentum, becoming part of the political campaign, gaining economic muscle and even becoming something that the mainstream media embraced rather than something they saw as a threat. A larger number of newspapers, indeed, began to allow users to weigh in on particular stories and to upload their own photographs. A few even incorporated citizen blogs alongside those of staff reporters.

And perhaps since overhead and production costs are relatively low for corporate media companies, citizen-generated content is increasingly becoming part of these sites’ DNA.

Citizen journalism, in short, is becoming less something that is dismissed as the amateur hour before the professionals take the stage and more something that enriches the conversation.
In the midst of these developments, the earlier form of citizen voice — blogs — began to grow in ways that raised question about whether it was becoming less a part of the grass roots and more a part of the establishment. A group of celebrity bloggers, for example, have emerged, and some have even become familiar faces on TV.

Web 2.0

For many industry analysts, 2006 was the year Web 2.0 made an impact on online media.
Web 2.0 is a broad term, first coined by Dale Dougherty and popularized by O’Reilly Media, a publisher of books and magazines mainly geared toward the technology community. It refers to any media that involve the interaction and participation of the consumer: uploading and disseminating text, audio, video and digital photographs over the Web. Well-known examples of Web 2.0 include Facebook, YouTube, Flickr, Wikipedia, and MySpace.

The number of Americans participating in Web 2.0 activities suggests it could soon become a major component of the online experience, according to survey research conducted by the Pew Internet & American Life Project.

According to a study released in February by the University of Maryland’s J-Lab, such hyperlocal “citizen media” sites that rely on user-generated content are quickly proliferating. J-Lab has been able to identify 700 to 800 of them, the majority of which have been launched in the past two years.

The sites employ a wide variety of business and editorial models, but they appear to share a common enthusiasm for creating community conversations. Among the respondents to the J-Lab survey, 73% said they considered their sites a “success” and 82% planned to stick with their ventures indefinitely. Four out of five said their sites provided local information not found anywhere else, and three-quarters indicated that they helped build connections to the community. Slightly more than a quarter of those surveyed thought these operations increased voter turnout.5

There are questions, however, about the economics of citizen media. The J-Lab report acknowledged that many of the outlets were “shoestring” operations hampered by a lack of human and financial resources. And even as it predicted that the medium was here to stay, the study also anticipated significant turnover and burnout among the operators.

When asked how much it cost to launch their “citizen media” sites, 43% of the survey respondents put the figure at less than $1,000. In addition, 51% said they didn’t need to earn revenue to continue operating. Asked if their revenues exceeded operating costs, 42% said no and another 38% did not know.6

Some of these operations are diversifying their revenue base and developing distinctive brands — such as the Rocky Mountain-based New West, which has created related businesses in advertising and publishing. But as the report suggests, many of the sites at this point are essentially mom-and-pop operations.

Perhaps the key question is whether an economic model built almost exclusively around ad revenue will prove sustainable in the long run. According to some analysts who study citizen media sites, the sites urgently need to create multiple revenue streams, not just from advertising, especially in times when revenue and profits are down.

But increasingly, analysts believe consumers will come to demand the ability to interact with the news producers, or they will migrate elsewhere. Indeed, some industry analysts argue that online newspapers and other news sites need to offer more interactivity in order to survive. “What makes the Internet so attractive is consumers can communicate with consumers. And they can communicate with [the publication] in a way they feel comfortable with,” said Gerard Broussard, senior partner and director of media analytics at GroupM Interaction, at the Media magazine Forecast 2007 conference.

Blogs

For all the growth in interactivity, perhaps the purest form remains blogging, or personal Weblogs, the phenomenon in which someone creates a site and becomes an instant own publisher and writer. After seeming to stall or even lose some momentum in 2005, there was evidence that blogs regained momentum again in 2006. Whether a political season had something to do with that, or whether the gain was more widespread, is uncertain.

Blog Readership

The most recent data suggest a significant increase in the number of people who read blogs. Survey results from the Pew Internet & American Life Project indicates that the percentage of online users who say they have ever read blogs rose in February 2006 to 39%, up markedly from 27% a year earlier. That puts the total number of Americans who now read blogs at approximately 57 million.7

But to put that in perspective, a February 2006 Gallup survey found that reading blogs (20%) is far less popular than e-mail (87%), checking news and weather (72%), and shopping and travel (both at 52%), and is still behind some online activities that are generally considered to be fringe use: instant messaging (28%), auctions (23%), and videocasts and downloading music (22%).8
Of course, the rise of blogs has its roots in politics, when bloggers gave the 2004 Presidential contender Howard Dean early, albeit short-lived, momentum. Two years later, it appeared a higher number of Democrats read blogs than Republicans. According to data from Gallup, 15% of the population who said they are frequent blog readers identified themselves as Democrats, compared to just 6% who said they were Republican and 7% who considered themselves independent.9

What types of blogs are people reading? While the blogs that generate the most buzz are ones devoted to politics, many popular blogs focus on other topics. Research from Edelman, a public relations firm, found that of the top 100 blogs in the U.S., 34% cover technology, 26% are about culture, and 25% are devoted to politics. The study also found that just 3% were what it called “personal diaries.”10

Blog Creators

Blogs include everything from a personal diary about bird watching to an outlet that breaks news about current events to a promotional public relations tool on a car manufacturing site to a celebrity-filled gossip page. Some are the voice of just one person. Others serve more as forums open to any registered user to post opinions.

The number of bloggers, those who produce content as opposed to merely reading it, did not appear to grow in 2006. The most recent data from the Pew Internet & American Life Project suggest that just 8% of online users say they author their own blogs.11

In previous years of the annual report, we reported that bloggers tend to be younger, wealthier, and more tech-savvy than the general online population. The most recent data suggest this is still largely true. For instance, the Pew Internet & American Life Project reports that more than half of all bloggers are under 30. Moreover, bloggers are avid news consumers: 95% report reading news online, compared to 73% of the general online population, Pew Internet found.

We’ve also begun to understand more about the attitudes bloggers hold toward their work. Most bloggers, again according to Pew Internet, do not think of themselves as journalists. Over a third (37%) say their most popular topic is their life and experience (37%), more than twice number (11%) who named politics and news.12

It was long the consensus that since the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the blogosphere was dominated by conservative voices. But a close examination of the 12 most popular political blogs, according to a June 2006 listing from Technorati, revealed that at least at the top, blog voices lean to the left. Seven can be considered liberal, four conservative, and one without a clear partisan nature.

Blogging Economics

Except for a very small group, most bloggers make no money from their endeavors.
Just 8% of bloggers report generating any income from their Web sites, according to survey data from the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Among those bloggers who report making money, most say they do so by selling items on their sites (68%) or through advertising (56%). Smaller numbers receive donations from readers (29%) or secure subscriptions to premium content (19%). For now, anyway, that seems acceptable. Making money was the least-offered reason for blogging.13

Those bloggers who do earn some money have been hesitant to say publicly how much revenue the ads on their sites have generated. But the blogger ad market appears fairly small; one estimate puts it at $50 million to $100 million. But according to a research study conducted by Outsell Inc., which surveyed 1,200 advertisers in November 2005, blog advertising was expected to grow 43% in 2006.14

A few years ago, many media critics offered varying degrees of skepticism toward the fanfare that surrounded the emergence of blogs. And a minority even questioned how long they would be around.

Heading into 2007, some of that skepticism — shared by much of the public as well —remains. How much can one trust the accuracy of news and information posted on blogs? How can blogs survive without a reliable revenue stream?

It may be a case of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Much of the talk a few years ago — that blogs would supplant traditional media — seems antiquated now. The relationship between blogs and traditional media, in the end, may be more complementary, even synergistic, as time moves on. Citizen journalism, and the interactivity it promises in Web 2.0, increasingly seems to offer the potential of enriching traditional journalism (by enriching citizens), not threatening it.

Editors 'out of touch' with citizens



Sites such as Digg are setting a new agenda A news agenda formulated by citizens would be radically different from that put together by journalists.
That is the conclusion of a US study which compared what made the headlines in the mainstream media with that of three diverse user-driven news sources.
The study - conducted by a wing of the US Pew Research centre - compared stories over seven days.

Its results will make interesting reading for news editors as well as the new breed of citizen journalists.

The report - released by the Project for Excellence in Journalism - took a snapshot of news stories from the last week in June 2007.

Raw information

It compared the stories making the headline in 48 mainstream news sources, including TV, radio and online, to that of three user-driven news sites - Reddit, Digg and Del.icio.us.
It found that the interests of users was markedly different to that of traditional editors.
Seven out of ten of the stories selected by the user-driven sites came from blogs or non-news websites with only 5% of stories overlapping with the ten most widely-covered stories in the mainstream media.

"Users gravitated towards more eclectic stories. There was a sense that users sifting through a lot of raw information; rumour, gossip, propaganda and the news were all thrown into the mix," said Tom Rosenstiel, one of the authors of the report.

In a week dominated by stories about Iraq and the debate about immigration, users were more interested in the release of the iPhone and the news that Nintendo had surpassed Sony in net worth.

This technology bias was partly down to the fact that it was early adopters of technology that lead the way when it came to "playing with the potential of the internet to empower users", said Mr Rosenstiel.

Citizen editors

Traditional news gathering is not redundant quite yet. In all, 40% of the most popular stories on Digg and Del.icio.us, were devoted to technology with the second most popular category being lifestyle stories.

One of the biggest differences noted by the researchers was the emphasis put on a single story. While the mainstream media tended to revisit the same story from a different angle each day, users were happier dipping in to a variety of topics.

"It was more hit and miss with a sense that they wanted to know a little about a lot of things," said Mr Rosenstiel.

News editors need not hang up their notebooks and pens quite yet though. The report found that traditional news outlets such as the BBC still accounted for a quarter of the content on the user news sites. Interestingly, original content accounted for just 1%.

"That suggests that people are re-aggregating the news in the style of citizen editors rather than journalists," said Mr Rosenstiel.

"These sites offer people a different take on the news but it doesn't mean that traditional journalism has become irrelevant. They are forming more of secondary conversation about the news," he said.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

NickvanderLeek.com Hits 45 000


You may noticed an upsurge in tech capability of this site. This is due to a consistent and concentrated hands on approach.

Like anything, paying attention and focussing on your 'baby' is going to be analogous to nurturing, and anything nurtured will provide you with a gain, an improvement on previous results/behaviour.

Being situated now in the centre of news/information, it is part of my job to know and understand what is popular, what is working, and how to take that further. How does one recycle your visitor through your site, transforming a hit into a journey, transforming the surfer into an avid explorer.

One way is to have an appropriate mix of content: news, images, text, video etc. Recently I've upgraded all of these. Content on the web is currency.

The latest innovation, and one I have been wanting to bring about since this Blog started nearly 3 years ago (in October 2004) has been to streamline and simplify the URL. It makes sense to have an accessible and appropriate naming convention, and since March 2005 3 x Luck (3rd Time Lucky) has not been a boon to this site.

Blogger has also upgraded its features and use-ability a great deal.

I have to also say that the purpose of this site is not chiefly to promote me. It is to generate awareness on the crucially important issues of our time, and to the extent that the webcounter spins faster, it means this important consciousness is spreading. If I am to be associated with credibility, then that is a good result. I believe there are many important things individuals can do that can make a real and meaningful difference. And this blog needs to challenge the overriding question of our time:

Are we too selfish to change?

I have a feeling post- End of the World (which means Post Carbon), credible blogs will provide vital and crucial information relating to functioning and survival and finding communities.
This seems fanciful and even silly, except the clock is ticking. Peak Oil has occurred in 2006, which means 'bad stuff' is heading our way and gaining momemtum. It's already happening. We think it's going to get better, but it's not. It's not nice, it's not a happy idea, but please don't patronise anyone and call it negative thinking. What we need is a mixture of positive thinking and critical thinking. Especially the latter.

What isn't working?

And then, what can we do?
All we can do is organise ourselves, and our communities, and have an influence on bettering our immediate environments. That's what this blog is all about.

Monday, September 10, 2007

World's first internet president logs on


Web already shaping policy of new South Korean leader

Jonathan Watts in Seoul
Monday February 24, 2003
The Guardian

South Korea will stake a claim to be the most advanced online democracy on the planet tomorrow with the inauguration of a president who styles himself as the first leader fully in tune with the internet.

From calls for a softer stance towards North Korea to demands for a revision of the security alliance with the US, websites are already shaping the position of Roh Moo-hyun's new administration.

"The development of internet technology has changed the whole political dynamic in South Korea to an extent that the outside world has not yet grasped," said Yoon Yong-kwan, the head of foreign policy formulation in Mr Roh's transitional team. "It will affect foreign policy."

The rise of webocracy has already made South Korea a place of exhilarating but unpredictable change.

In recent months online campaigns have swung the presidential election, stirred tens of thousands into anti-US protests and nudged government policy on the nuclear standoff.

New Korea's hi-tech credentials have been a focus of national pride. Its biggest claim to international fame is the development of internet services, which are far ahead of most countries. Almost 70% of homes have a broadband connection, compared with about 5% in Britain.

Because of the high connection speeds, much faster than most British broadband, people use the web more for shopping, trading and chatting. Koreans are said to spend 1,340 minutes online per month, and 10% of economic activity is related to IT - one of the highest levels in the world.

"The internet is so important here," a western diplomat in Seoul said. "This is the most online country in the world. The younger generation get all their information from the web. Some don't even bother with TVs. They just download the programmes."

The voice of this New Korea is OhmyNews, arguably the world's most domestically powerful news site, which has built up almost as big a readership and as fearsome a reputation for moving public opinion as the Sun.

"OhmyNews is as influential as any newspaper," a South Korean diplomat in Tokyo said. "No policymaker can afford to ignore it. South Korea is changing in ways that we cannot believe ourselves."

Polls showed that the victory in December of Mr Roh - who claims to be the world's first president to understand HTML website coding - came from a huge surge of support from twenty- and thirty-somethings. In South Korea, where elections are usually decided by regional rather than generational loyalties, this was a dramatic development.

It was not the last. An OhmyNews report on an accident in which two girls were crushed to death by a US army tractor prompted one surfer to call for demonstrations. Within a week, South Korea was witnessing the biggest anti-US protests in its history.

"We are becoming very powerful," said Bae Eul-sun, one of the Ohmynews editorial team. "The pay is lousy, but it is very satisfying to work here because I really feel like I can change the world little by little."

When the new administration takes power, its external priorities will mark a continuation of the "sunshine policy" of outgoing president Kim Dae-jung, who focused on maintaining a strong alliance with the United States while engaging with North Korea.

But Mr Yoon said policy towards North Korea would be developed to reflect public opinion better. This is likely to give more influence to domestic media and less to the US.

"We will maintain strong ties with the US, but our young people have tasted democracy and they speak out about what they feel. They believe bilateral relations are important but unlike the older generation they don't think it is taboo to make demands of the US."

The change is already apparent. In comparison with the efforts it made during the last North Korean nuclear crisis in 1993-94, Seoul has taken a far more active role in trying to head off a confrontation - even at the expense of infuriating its ally.

Friday, September 07, 2007

A Media Marriage Made In Heaven


Is Telkom unbunbling itself in a move to ultimately transform itself in a Media company. Is a giant rival on the cards to rival the Naspers Multichoice Juggernaut? Maybe!

Imagine this: a streamlined shell of Telkom with pockets bulging with R100 billion in cash. That's how much they would get having shed their fixed line and 50% stake in Vodacom.

And then?

Well, perhaps Johncom - who are already streamlining their own portfolio - and Caxtons and why not throw in eTV (with their Warner Alliance) for a 'deal of the century'. And voila: TJC Communications (Telkom, Johnnic + Caxton).

Stranger things have happened, and the ball is in play.

Credibility and Good Writing


What makes a great news site?

In a word: credibility. Credibility is based on high quality graphics, and good writing.

The most valuable credibility comes from firsthand encounters. That means you seeing something firsthand, and reporting it. The value erodes as this experience becomes increasingly secondhand, thirdhand and worse.

After that, good writing comes in 2 forms: the writing itself (the content) and then how it is presented.

If you're a blogger, or in charge of designing articles for websites, remember the following:

- highlight keywords (people can skim a page in 3 quarters of a second)
- create meaningful subheadings (these must not regurgitate what is in the underlying paragraph)
- provide easy to read bulleted lists (like this one)
- present one idea per paragraph
- have a pyramidical structure (presenting essentially a punchline, and then providing supporting evidence as the underlying triangular structure
- half the word count you'd generally have in magazines and the newspaper


Bullseye

An interesting question here is to what extent you would want to target your text. For example, you could make it very simple and somewhat informal, but then the risk is a diluted, blank audience who might feel 'dumbed down'. Obviously, if it is adequately simple and readable, you get a more 'Reader's Digest' audience - that is, understood by all.

3 Areas

A more targetted style of writing (which I personally prefer) means a more targetted audience, which means revenue can be generated (via content related and targetted advertising). The risk of less simple text is turning away perhaps a majority of readers who prefer non-serious 'popcorn' content. Thus a good mix between quality, credibility and accessiblity is important.

Web 1.0 or 2.0?

What impact is online news having on print media? Is blogging having an impact on the journalistic profession? Yes. But the core of writing is still being done by experts.

If you want to compete, or even talk with the big guns in writing, you have to raise your game. In the same way, if you want your story to be picked up by the major newspapers, it has to be, at a minimum, a good brief.

What that means is, whether you are a citizen journalist or working for an online newsroom, your building blocks should build SOMETHING. Then it can be handed over and using the kernels* of information you're provided, converted to a higher form of knowledge or even wisdom (in the context of news).

Of course, if an article is so hyperlocal or specialised, it might be handed back to a reporter with this demand: flesh out, develop this story.

Captain Fantastic is Elastic

Since online news sites are more flexible than the more static and deadline fixated print media, it is possible for online resources to be based on a Web First scenario. The Web, when properly integrated, can be a highly elastic source of information.

In fact, the best result of news sites in particular, is where these platforms enable users to have a conversation. Communities want to speak amopngst themselves.

When short, simple articles break very quickly online, they can be handed over whilst still 'fresh' to be elaborated and developed in the print medium. This allows the online resource to fully develop itself as a fast and efficient detector of source material.

It can then function as the first originator of flexible and consistently fresh material. The newspaper feeds back and forward to its online counterpart, integrating what is most readable, relevant and appropriate for further fleshing out on paper. In essence, newspapers ought to carry those stories that are just that: the best stories.

One Playing Field

The Web First scenario should not be interpreted as a ranking system. That's not to be implied or inferred at any level. It's a chronological system which is intended to be functionally collaborative. This means Online and Print play on the same field, but perhaps spend more time is various sectors of the field.

It is helpful for the journalists and writers involved, I think, to have an integrated approach in order for Print and Online to enjoy the maximum benefit. If the mindset is that news does not belong to anyone, it is not owned, then inhouse sharing of stories (from online to print and vice versa) can encouraged and the corporate involved will see Win/Win results in both mediums.

Another area that should be the focus of the online journalist is an online follow up on stories. This can be followed through statistics, but even without a technical focus, you the writer can check to see how much coverage your story is getting. Is it still on the homepage after Day 1?

How To Impress...

On this site a number of work related stories (including How To Impress Your Boss)have done well, which should encourage the writer to investigate his theme even further with supporting material (perhaps: How to Impress Your Colleagues in this case).

Remember, many people in South Africa have web access at work, thus work related issues are going to interest them.

Another useful area to 'mine' for ideas is forums and message boards.

Google Maps

An exceptional underutlized area (online and in the print medium) is the simple use of maps and statistics. Google Maps is an extraordinary tool. Any person can mine the internet for statistics, and then visually represent these using Google Maps for very effective articles.

This can be applied to all manner of angles, from crime, to elections, to the number of schools in your neighborhood. Where are the most expensive houses, or the best restaurants, or the big malls in your area? Plot the statistics, and send them in.

A Final Tip

For regular registered reporters on this site: if you would like to quickly search through the archive of your (or other reporter's) stories (without logging in), type in the appropriate name in the searchbar (top right).

This can be used to quickly piece together all the links to stories you (and other reporters you might be interested in) have already produced. This is your easy to use portfolio. You can email the link to friends or prospective employees.

The Incredibles

Remember, at the end of the day, credibility works both ways. Writers want to be associated with a credible resource - whether it is a website, magazine or newspaper. But all these different forms of media also want to be associated with credible people too, including writers.

Credibility as stated above, is based on effort. Good writing does not always come easy; good graphics may take a little extra time to develop and fine-tune. But over the long term, the results will compliment your portfolio.

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Silver surfers rule the net


By Tom Dennen

Survey finds that oldies spend more time online than youngsters.

Media watchdog Ofcom’s UK Internet user figures are out – and are a typical reflection of affluent Internet users. Pensioners - ‘Silver Surfers’ – spend more time online than youngsters.
Pensioners surfing the internet are spending more time online than their younger counterparts. The "Silver Surfers" dedicate an average of 42 hours a month to the World Wide Web, compared with 37.9 hours among 18 to 24-year-olds, the survey concluded.

A greater interest in hobbies, news and local issues among the elderly is believed to be driving the trend, which sees over-65s account for nine per cent of all time spent online in the UK. The figures debunk the traditional image of pensioners as technophobes and youngsters as web wizards.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Disruptive Technologies: Are you armed and dangerous?


How - and why - to join the online revolution


Why blog? For the same reason people buy cargo pants (with a terrorist design), wear Crocs and use cellphones. Because everyone is doing it.


But what makes blogs different to Crocs and cargo pants is that 10 years from now, everyone will have a blog (something like a business card), except not only businessmen will introduce themselves, but brats too, through their blogs.


A 'Disruptive Technology’ according to Wikipedia is:


’...a technological innovation, product, or service that eventually overturns the existing dominant technology or status quo product in the market. Disruptive innovations can be broadly classified into lower-end and new-market disruptive innovations...’


It may sound like a mouthful, but essentially, disruptive technologies are very good for the average person. A good contemporary example is MXIT, which is giving the likes of Vodacom and MTN gray hairs in terms of losing their SMS market share. MXIT offers the same service at a fraction of the cost (each SMS costs around 1 cent).


Blogs are another excellent example of Disruptive Technologies, and in the same breath, so is Reporter.co.za. Reporter.co.za is essentially a user generated blog; it’s the crowd - you - sending us your thoughts and news. If you have a cellphone and an internet connection you can (possibly) compete with some of the best journalists out there. How? By being somewhere where they aren’t and couldn’t possibly be. You can!


Quality is a separate issue of course. People who are not trained to write, or take photos, do not always write stories or take photos that are worth the trouble to look at, or read. But sometimes they are. And sometimes they form the basis for the biggest news stories.
Some video footage for the 9/11 tragedy was provided, as I recall, by a Turkish tourist.* Someone’s cellphone provided us with footage on the London bombings, and recently, the ’London Bombings Again, Almost’.


A blog basically puts incredible power and resources into the hands of an individual. You don’t have to be a corporation with vast networks and resources to beam your message to the world.


Low Cost


You don’t need satellite dishes or banks filled with humming machines. A blog can really be quite a powerful thing: you inputting your thoughts here (on Reporter.co.za) or on your own blog (or both, as I do), and publishing them, means anyone, anywhere - whether it is Fiji or Iceland - can find you.

A mere mouseclick in an arbitrary office or bedroom means someone you don’t even know (or someone you do know) can and read and see what an individual was doing over the weekend in say, Johannesburg, a place they might otherwise never visit (or even think to visit).
A blog also provides the curious Netizen who doesn’t have a blog, with the opportunity to virtually visit, at very close quarters, the lives and times of people from New York to Nieu Bethesda.


Exciting


I find that tremendously exciting, although obviously the limit on how exciting it is depends on how exciting the person is that is loading up whatever it is they are loading onto the net.
This is a good thing to bear in mind, I think, whoever you are. Is it meaningful, is it worth knowing, is it interesting whether relevant to me or not?


Content(ious) Issues


You can make your content interesting by doing a little background research. Google and Wiki some of the terms you’re using and see what others have commented on your subject. Most important, check your own work for mistakes. Once you put it up, those flaws, if they are present, are going to put people ever investing their precious time in your thoughts.
Another reason to blog is to reach out and form, organically in a sense, niche markets, niche communities. This is an area that has made bloggers very competitive.


For example you might have a blog about fishing (the world’s largest outdoor sport), and so with a consistent theme, and updated content, you will be reaching friends and/or strangers that particularly want to be associated with you - and there’s your community. It’s specialised, and customised. This is also what Facebook is all about.


How to blog


A good blog is one that has something new on it each day. That may sound easier than it is. By some accounts there are already 200 million ex-bloggers, since most people who start blogs don’t keep them up and running forever. Some believe blogging will peak at 100 million bloggers.** I think that’s conservative and shortsighted, since China has only just started.
In the end though, good blogs are like good newspapers and magazines. They are worth reading (or watching in the case of video blogs) if the writing (or video) is good. The same applies to this website. So when is writing good, and worth reading?


Many writers, especially citizen journalists underestimate the incredible appeal of local stories. Writing about some of the main stories (for example, the debacle concerning the Health Minister) means that citizen journalists have to compete with acres and acres of excellent broadcast writing on the same subject.


To compete effectively, citizen journalists must invest themselves HYPERlocally. That means, report what is happening in your neighborhood. I recently participated in a discussion*** on this subject, where the speaker spoke about a series of stories sent in by citizens on potholes, in the United Kingdom.


Ordinary people began to take photos of the nearest hazard (using their cellphones), and then sent them in to the BBC. This started a snowball, which led to the implementation of Google Mapping (to form a grid of all the pockmarked routes in England) and probably led to some sort of broader municipal effort to sort out the problem. This story started with hyperlocal content.
You can start a blog by heading to blogger, at www.blogger.com, and follow easy setup instructions. Or, you can make use of the audience that’s here, and encourage others like yourself to do the same, right here at Reporter.co.za. Go on, join the revolution!


*If you have more details on exactly who provided the 9/11 footage, please contact Reporter.co.za and let us know

**Gartner Report’s Top 10 Predictions for 2007

***http://www.andydickinson.net/