Shapiro on the problem of 'Entitlement'

David Shapiro: We need to follow the example of countries like Australia, which commit to long-term programmes that identify talented youngsters — regardless of race or economic well- being — and nurture their special skills by ensuring first-rate training facilities, experienced coaches and some form of financial reward. What we don’t need is political interference; nosy meddling in the administration of our sporting bodies.

When we demonstrate that we are serious about winning medals at the Olympics, the sponsors will return. And instead of a team that looked as if it was dressed for a sleep-over party, we may just warrant Armani.

NVDL: This is a worldwide problem, especially chronic in the USA.

clipped from www.thetimes.co.za In the few instances, like swimming, in which we stood a small chance of gaining gold, we can’t really claim credit for developing the talent of our Olympic contenders. The Olympics is about elitism; a competition in which the world’s best competes. There is no room for mediocrity. Minimum standards are set down for qualification, with no concessions or dispensation given to the poor or disadvantaged. Yet, throughout Olympic history, many needy nations, lacking the financial backing and technical assistance available to affluent countries like the US, have still managed to produce outstanding athletes whose accomplishments have captured the warmth and affection of the viewing public. Our failures can’t be linked to finances. If we are bold enough to stage World Cup 2010 and to indulge R11-million on a bungled publicity campaign at a top-class Beijing hotel to promote it, then surely we can afford the expense of getting our athletes ready for a showpiece like the Olympics.