Thursday, June 07, 2007

Biologists Are Making Skin Cells Work Like Stem Cells


By Nicholas Wade
June 7, 2007

In a surprising advance that could sidestep the ethical debates surrounding stem cell biology, researchers have come much closer to a major goal of regenerative medicine, the conversion of a patient’s cells into specialized tissues that might replace those lost to disease.

The advance is an easy-to-use technique for reprogramming a skin cell of a mouse back to the embryonic state. Embryonic cells can be induced in the laboratory to develop into many of the body’s major tissues.

If the technique can be adapted to human cells, researchers could use a patient’s skin cells to generate new heart, liver or kidney cells that might be transplantable and would not be rejected by the patient’s immune system. But scientists say they cannot predict when they can overcome the considerable problems in adapting the method to human cells.

Previously, the only way to convert adult cells to embryonic form has been by nuclear transfer, the insertion of an adult cell’s nucleus into an egg whose own nucleus has been removed. The egg somehow reprograms the nucleus back to an embryonic state. That procedure is known as therapeutic cloning when applied to people, but no one has yet succeeded in doing it.

For the full story visit www.nytime.com or click on the title of this post.

Email from D



By the way - I am horrified to read about the vitriolic attack on you by the cycling fraternity. Are they afraid of being challenged by someone who is not afraid to speak up? Sounds like the response of someone who has his back against the wall and therefore uses the tactic that attack is the best form of defence which in my book translates as coward.
Dont be goaded into saying something they can use against you- sound like a mean bunch but I am glad u r standing your man and not letting them walk over u.

Jan Ullrich


Supertube


Andre going into blitzkrieg puncture fixing mode.

A man who is trampled by an elephant is a man who is blind and deaf - African Proverb

Movie Review: Venus

It’s the end of an old man’s life, but the human heartstrings hum with the very last and best of this life’s beauty, humor and meaning

Peter O’Toole plays a veteran actor who although famous, respected and well liked, knows his life is coming to an end. It is a courageous role, perhaps not so far from the truth, but moments of austerity are tempered by moments of exquisiteness, subtlety, wit and funniness. Above all, this is an intelligent and evocative flick.

If you are reluctant to see a film about an old timer, don’t be. O’ Toole, who 3 years ago received an honorary Oscar (basically a lifetime achievement award), famously declared that he wasn’t done; that he had a lot of acting left in him. Well, here is the proof of the pudding.

It is a powerful film simply because you really do believe the old man doesn’t have long to live. And there is entropy setting in. In an early scene he is sitting on a bed, alone, in the quiet of his room. Then one is startled by Maurice, this elegant old man violently slapping his own face and bellowing, growling to himself: “GET UP OLD MAN.”
Will we grow old with a similar resistance to our own slowing down; will we resist our own systematic decay and giving up with such passion and vigor?

While some elements will deplore the subject matter of this flick – a very old man becoming obsessed, even falling in love with a young woman more than half a century younger, who moves in with his sometimes crotchety best friend – more discerning movie goers will realize that a much deeper message is conveyed. Values such as friendship, consideration and appreciation of fellow human beings are portrayed in an unusual setting: the gray and drab of London.

This flick is an important lesson, even a reality check. After all, everyone will get old and lose their attractiveness, but is anyone ever too old to be attracted to youth and beauty? In a sense we see the tremendous courage of an old man, who woos the young girl somewhat tongue in cheek (by offering to pay for her dress in an exclusive store by proffering a clipping of his friend’s toenail). We’re amused at his attempts to make some extra money (both for himself and for her). The old man is sometimes helplessly charmed, other times pathetically manipulated. One of the funniest scenes is him falling off a bucket (rather than kicking it) and into a room filled with painters and easels.

The scene where the old man waits for her on the pier is particularly poignant; we have all done that. Waited desperately for someone, even long after it is obvious that they are not going to arrive.

One aspect that irked me a little was his calling his muse (played by Jodie Whittaker) Venus. But having ruminated on this for a while, it not seems that it would hardly have the same effect if he called her by some other name. Perhaps the adoption of the name, and her acceptance of it, could have been done better. It’s arguable, because somehow the clever script may have made us intentionally uncomfortable with such a quick deification of what at first appears to be an ordinary-on-the-surface, obnoxious, always hungry, pretty but cocky young lady. Thus it is with artful flourishes that we see her transform into Venus, not only outwardly in the final scene, but we’re privy to powerful inward changes that reach out and touch, in delicate strokes, the empty spaces in us that most films never probe.

It’s regrettable that some people have dubbed this an ‘art’ film. Possibly, some young parents might not like the idea (having not seen the film) of their young daughters hanging around with the stereotypical ‘dirty old man’. But every man is the old man (or will be some day), and every woman is the beautiful young girl (at some stage). Although Venus may seem somewhat sinister, it’s really about the metaphor that this young woman represents. After all, Ian (Leslie Phillips) the old man she looks after (and Maurice’s best friend) cannot stand her, and yet the other old man sees so much, everything in her, and is desperate just to be in her company. And it is interesting to see how she responds to someone so mature, whom she can talk to about important and unimportant things.

Loneliness is an almost certain fate for old people, even if they have their spouses with them. Venus represents youth at its most pristine, beauty as a fragile source of tremendous power, yet she is introduced with her rough-around-the-edges charm, in a world similar imperfect, but also wonderful. It is this world that the old man, Maurice, must leave behind. But flaws are also charming, especially once we see how much a thing, a person, that is loved and cared for, can transform itself from what it is not, and into what it truly is.

Inside all of us is a lover, an athlete, a dancer, a poet, a teacher, a romantic, a husband or a wife, a fighter, a friend, a victim, a worker, and then, also, a dreamer. The film seems to suggest that it is the dreams of love that we must pursue, and the dreams of life we must set out to live while we are alive and strong. When the long years of our lives have gone, will we have the vigor to confidently acknowledge the beauty we see, that tugs as powerfully and as painfully as it ever did, and will we still act on it knowing how little life left is left in our bodies?

It’s likely that many who see this film will find themselves grateful for the beauty and power of their own youth, and pausing the next time they kiss a loved one, or touch another’s hands, or walk barefoot into the cold foam of a beach.

Released by Miramax, directed by Roger Michell; written by Hanif Kureishi,

Cast:
Maurice - Peter O'Toole
Ian - Leslie Phillips
Valerie - Vanessa Redgrave
Donald - Richard Griffiths
Jessie - Jodie Whittaker
Jillian - Cathryn Bradshaw
Running time: 1 hour, 35 minutes.
MPAA rating: R, for language, some sexual content and brief nudity


Movie review: 'Venus'
By Michael Wilmington
Tribune movie critic


O'Toole achieves poignancy not by groping for our heartstrings but by honestly revealing Maurice's weakness and lost stature, by showing the raging charmer beneath the aging flesh.

Maurice, by contrast, is stooped and delicate, with a sneaky, crumbling little smile. He looks weak, weary. But this is a performance. We have only to recall last year's "Lassie," where O'Toole was the more robust and commanding Duke of Rudling, to realize he's playing fragility rather than succumbing to it on screen.

The Hub Bub



Found some posts mysteriously deleted off The Hub after I left work. Was a pity since Carinus Lemmer (head honcho at CSA) responded to a comment I left, inviting discussion, but before I could respond (as Draco Malvoy) I was blocked again.



Carinus, could you please explain the following:
[Quoting Carinus]: 1. Ek weet nie hoekom enigiemand 'n late entry gekry het nie - MAAR weet dat David tot by Lawrence gegaan het - een ander ou van Gau kon ook laat enter, aangesien sy provinsie iets ge-bungle het....ons werk tans aan 'n voorstel dat late entries tot op die laaste oomblik anvaar kan word, in die toekoms, maar met sekere voorbehoude...

This seems to suggest that late entires are acceptable providing you have approached certain individuals beforehand. That seems fair, obviously, and flexible.
But how is this any different to the Sunblock saga, where van der Leek was refused participation on the grounds that it was late, never mind those in his club and others whom he said he approached beforehand?


Quote: Let the sunshine in.


Carinus (latrinus emmer) responded with:



I attempted to arrange for a meeting between myself and Mr van der Leek, just over 10 days ago.He seemed to indicate a lack in willingness/interest.I can not tell you anything about Mr van der Leek's situation, as I have not been privy to his dealings with CSA, his province or his club(s).By this posting, I again invite him to make contact, so we may meet and hash things into shape.



Thanks,

Carinus


But the moderator (CruxPearl) did this:


Nice try Nick!!!
Please don't think all people stupid because you're an asshole
Account Suspended!!!!


Edited by Cruxpearl - Yesterday at 4:32pm



But I responded as a different avatar: Draco Sondebok.



Rookie Joined: Yesterday Location: Albania Online Status: Online Posts: 1


Posted: Yesterday at 5:21pm
Carinus ja, you did email me and I emailed you back. But I wasn't convinced that it wasn't just going to be an uitkak parade. You may recall in my email I said:
I don't have a club or license so what would be the point?

Since SA's has passed I would still like to address those individuals at my ex club who have maintained a dodgy silence throughout.

Please email me at
bobthornton.thornton20@gmail.com and perhaps hopefully we can achieve more constructive results than on this domain.



Also got a call last night from Karel and sms to 'stay away or else.' Think the deletions were to cover-up and clean-up some messy moderating that was exposed by my article sent to reporter.co.za. Am going to spend a bit more time on an article to Ohmynews, and see what the Koreans think of this level of forum piracy/sabotage/bias etc.

More SA Champs Pics


Not sure, is this Malcolm Lange?














Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Crime Strikes Ryk's Family


Above image courtesy Die Volksblad

I'm unhappy to have read in today's paper about some more hard knocks against the Neethling family. A friend of mine was at Eunice when Elsje was diagnosed and operated on 13 years ago. It is a terrible unseen force to have to live with, and now a growth has appeared in her back. Good to know Elsje is in good hands (the original doctor that treated her successfully).

From the report below:

Having heard the diagnosis Jean Marie flew up (she had been writing exams) to be with her parents at Elsje's bedside.
On the way back from the airport her mom San Marie was injured when a man broke the window of her car. She gave up her cellphone at knifepoint, her husband then sped away.


Mrs Neethling echoes my own sentiments: Bloem is better than Jburg, certainly in terms of crime and personal safety.


Misdaad tref Ryk se gesin
Jun 06 2007 12:01:23:730AM - (SA)
Dirk Kok

TERWYL die Suid-Afrikaanse swemmer Ryk Neethling se ouers met die siekte van hul middelste kind ’n traumatiese tyd beleef, was hulle ook die slagoffers van misdaad in Johannesburg.

Mnr. Ryk Neethling, bekende prokureur van Bloemfontein, sy vrou, San-Marié, en hul jongste kind, die swemmer Jean-Marié, was Maandagaand by ’n verkeerslig in Beyers Naudé-rylaan die slagoffers van ’n breek-en-grypdief.

Mev. Neethling het kneuswonde waar die rower haar in die gesig geslaan het en ligte snywonde van die glas van die passasiersruit wat langs haar kop stukkend geslaan is.

Die Neethling-egpaar staan hul dogter Elsje, verslaggewer van Volksblad, in die Wilgeheuwel-hospitaal in Randburg by. Sy het as kind breinkanker gehad en ’n gewas is nou in haar rug gekry.

Elsje het Maandag ’n biopsie ondergaan waarna die gesin gehoor het die gewas kan moontlik kwaadaardig of gevaarlik wees.

Net ná dié slegte nuus het die egpaar vir Jean-Marié op die O.R. Tambo-lughawe gaan haal om haar by die gesin in Johannesburg aan te sluit. Jean-Marié, ’n matriekleerling aan die Hoërskool Sentraal, het verlede week in Bloemfontein agtergebly om eksamen te skryf.

Op pad terug van die lughawe af na hul kind in die hospitaal, het die rower op hul motor toegeslaan.

Mev. Neethling vertel: “Ons het by die eerste verkeerslig op die Beyers Naudé-afrit vir die rooi lig gestop. Dit het soos ’n geweerskoot geklink toe die ruit langs my breek.

“Die volgende oomblik het die rower my gegryp. Ek is met die vuis geslaan. Ons het nie geweet wil hy ons kaap of wat hy wil hê nie.

“Toe ek sy mes sien, het ek besef ek moet hom iets gee. Ek het hom my selfoon gegee en Ryk het op die regte oomblik vet gegee en weggejaag.

“Ons sien uit daarna om in Bloemfontein terug te wees. Ek weet nie hoe mense met soveel vrees kan leef nie. Bloemfontein bly maar die beste.”

Sy en haar man sê die voorval was vir hulle en hul kinders baie traumaties.

Mev. Neethling sê verdere toetse word deur dokters gedoen om te besluit watter behandeling die beste vir Elsje gaan wees. “Sy is in goeie hande. Haar dokter is prof. Mauritz van den Heever, die neurochirurg wat haar 13 jaar gelede suksesvol vir breinkanker geopereer het.”

Ryk jr., wat in Arizona vir die volgende wêreldbyeenkomste oefen, gesels daagliks met sy ouers en siek suster oor die telefoon.

Rainy Day


Image courtesy topleftpixel.com
"The trend is that although many people aren’t sure that vitamins are effective, they consume and use them on the off chance that they might be. Now we have clinical evidence to prove the cardinal error in this line of thinking."


In the place of the word 'vitamins' subsitute the word God/any particular religion that people popularly practise. And for 'there might be' add the words 'a heaven or a life after death.' This is the perfect analogy for popular delusion that does a great deal of harm in the name of good (and includes good intentions).

Cultural Concerns


"Reality can now be continually reconfigured..."
Clink on the image to enlarge.

Bionic Beauty Salon


by Gretchen I Stoeltje

"In this vivid narrative Gretchen Stoeltje gives us witness to the crux of women's contemporary heroism. The six just-pubescent women who are seen throughout testify to their strategies for achieving power, and the dragon dangers in cultural standards for beauty. This brief, effective film will be welcome indeed in women studies, popular culture, mythology, and narrative classrooms at secondary and college levels."
–Marta Weigle, Feminist anthropologist, University of New Mexico Author, Spiders and Spiders: Women and Mythology Creation and Pr

MORE ABOUT THE FILM

Bionic Beauty Salon addresses the insecurities in women of all ages who learn to place their self-worth in the measure of their beauty. Its personal voice and funny, adolescent sensibility make it intellectually accessible to girls and women of all ages. The film offers a model for how to reclaim the media and find one's self through one's own voice. As art, it provides students much needed direct contact with poetic and artistic uses of electronic media. Its primary audience is teenage girls but should include anyone who struggles to understand female socialization, and anyone who has ever assessed the physical beauty of a woman.

Bionic Beauty Salon subjects the beauty standard, an abstract mechanism of culture, to the distinctly unabstract opinions of teenage girls. Says one, "you can have a great personality, but if you're fat, it's like you're half a person." Says another, "Society wants you to be self confident and they want you to respect your body. But then you observe the type of respect that beautiful women get and you think: I shouldn't feel bad but I do."

Companion and counterpoint to these interviews, a pair of perfect ruby lips dole out beauty tips from inside a compact's mirror, a surgeon performs liposuction on tapioca and jello, an ice cream sandwich sunbathes by the pool, and a grown woman searches for cosmetic-counter salvation. Overseeing these struggles, the Bionic Woman, TV's first cyber-Barbie, recharges in luxury at her Bionic Beauty Salon, a toy marketed to TV-watching girls in the '70s.

Appropriate for:
Middle School•High School•College/University

22 minutes • VHS

Sally




Email from BB

Ek het bedank as sekretaresse by DIY Tokkie Wheelers van die einde van Junie.

The Vitamin Conspiracy

Are our attempts to boost immunity doing more harm than good?

It was in a Biology class when I was a teenager, that I first learned the concept that excess Vitamin C is carcinogenic. I remember reading the section of text a few times over, and then passing it around. It was hard to believe then, and now, years later, people use vitamins even more, far in excess of recommended levels.

Dr. Michael Leitzmann and his colleagues have discovered that men who ingest excess vitamins are particularly vulnerable to cancer of the prostate. When men habitually ingest more than the 7 recommended doses in a given week, their chances of contracting an advanced cancer spikes 30%; the chance of contracting a deadly cancer doubles through this same habit of consuming excess multivitamins. These findings are based on almost 300 000 men who were studied over a 5 year period to determine a link between prostate cancer and multivitamin use.

No general cancer risk was evident; instead the risk was related to a more aggressive cancer, capable of moving beyond the prostate gland. The message then is directed at men; that if they must take multivitamins, to stick to the prescribed doses.

In terms of the anti-oxidants (A, E and beta-carotene), 47 clinical trials conducted by the Cochrane Centre on 180 000 volunteers determined a greater risk of death as a result of merely making use of these supplements. No evidence, for example, was found that anti-oxidants were able to prevent cardiovascular infections. It was also determined that the consumption of these supplements did more harm than good in healthy subjects, as opposed to pregnant women or others (e.g. those HIV positive) suffering from chronic vitamin deficiencies.

Vitamin C and selenium was found to neither decrease the risk of death, or increase it (at the correct dosage), meaning, there was a negligible benefit if any.

The trend is that although many people aren’t sure that vitamins are effective, they consume and use them on the off chance that they might be. Now we have clinical evidence to prove the cardinal error in this line of thinking.

Prof. Jimmy Volmink (of the South African Cochrane Centre) commenting on research conducted by the Cochrane Centre, recommends that vitamins be sought directly at source: in produce, such as fruits and vegetables.

Volmink also added that it is more beneficial to one’s health to go on a long holiday, than to take anti-oxidants.

Of course, the reason millions of people use vitamins in the first place is because it is Big Business, and Big Business sells it to consumers under the guise of supposed (potential but not proven) efficacy. AC Nielsen pegged the total sales value of vitamins sold in 2006 (in South Africa) at R570 million. This figure is increasing at over 25% a year, according to the report by AC Nielsen.

For some years, aware of the fallacy surrounding vitamins, I have critically looked at the language advertisers use to promote everything from anti-aging creams to vitamins. In almost every case, the emotive language makes use of crucial qualifiers, like ‘can’, or ‘may’, and in some cases ‘helps’.
Example:
So Vitamin X can bring health to your whole family. Be vigilant! Be discerning!
Sure it can, but not in terms of the way it is packaged. Vitamins that are packaged are seldom, if ever, effective, and even when they might be they need to be absorbed at the correct levels and often in combination with other substances such as minerals, enzymes etc. Buying vitamins off a shelf as the product advertised is simply a deception. In the same way that misleading tobacco advertising has been addressed, the same generally misrepresentative advertising and labelling ought to be nipped in the bud with regard to vitamin products.

Being aware of this, I asked my doctor to prescribe something that would really help boost immunity (following a secondary lung infection). He suggested Moducare, a formula which contains plant sterols and sterolins. On the packaging it claims to be: The only formula proven in extensive research. The dosage is high, 1 tablet 3 times daily.

Once again it seems as though laziness is what drives us to put our faith in vitamins in pill form. We are a society wanting to eat junk which robs the body of vital nutrients – such as the diuretics: caffeine and alcohol – but then we think we can play catch-up by fueling up on vitamins. It doesn’t happen that way. This approach costs us not only our health, but money otherwise better spent.

The way to health then is a straightforward but not necessarily convenient approach: regularly purchase fruit and vegetables. Preparing vegetables is also important when we’re conscious of their vitamin value. Avoid microwaving. Rather steam your vegetables until they are soft enough to eat. Boiling is best to avoid too since what the heat doesn’t kill, the goodness that remains goes into the water poured out of the pot.

Fruits can be consumed as is, but not substituted for fruit juice. The reason why fruits have vitamins and not fruit juices was explained to me once by a Hungarian doctor. It made an impression that stayed with me ever since. As soon as you kill an animal, or pluck a fruit from a tree, the vitality in the tissues of that plant or animal immediately begin to fall. Vitamins are precious threads of vitality in living organisms, but once the tissue is dead, the vitamin quality erodes quickly. Imagine it as a gas that seeps out with the spent lifeforce. The next step is imagining the storage of these vitamins, for days, weeks and months, alongside preservatives and other chemicals. The life and goodness has long since left the building. Thus the idea that consuming fruit juice as a credible substitute for the source fruit is simply crazy. Orange juice for example is rarely orange, and tastes nothing like freshly squeezed oranges. Also, original orange juice does not preserve well, nor for very long (as do many other juices). Even when natural preservatives are used (such as from apples and grapes), in the end it is still an artificial beverage that often has more sugar than soda pop, and very limited nutritional value.

Vitamins packed on shelves in pharmacies and supermarkets are therefore a big con. Why? Because vitamins, the vitality of the host, cannot be stored. Minerals, of course can be.
So if you are serious about looking after your health, or boosting your immunity, bear in mind The Vitamin Conspiracy. The old tried and trusted common denominators are free or cheap, and will add years of quality to your life: eat fresh produce every day, exercise, get enough sleep, rest and find time to live and laugh.

Background for this article sourced and translated from an article by Diana-Marie Strydom: Antioksidante kan jou dood beteken, se navorsers (Antioxidants kan kill you, researchers say).

Movie Review: Venus



By Kenneth Turan, Times Staff Writer

Three years ago, Peter O'Toole expressed dismay at receiving an honorary Oscar, saying he was "still in the game." The transporting performance he gives in "Venus" proves that he was not kidding.

Told with wit, genuine poignancy and all kinds of humor, "Venus" (opening Thursday) charts the unlikely relationship between a man in his 70s and a young woman more than half a century his junior. This is a relationship unlike any we've seen, and it's a measure of the film's subtle gifts that it is easier to watch it unfolding than to precisely define what we're seeing.

For though it looks to be about things fleeting and ephemeral, "Venus" touches, without forcing anything, on what matters most in life: love, friendship, connection. It's about aging and what keeps you alive, about the getting and passing on of the wisdom of a lifetime. And it is done with such surpassing skill on both sides of the camera that we can't help but marvel at it all.It starts with the work of two of Britain's most adroit film professionals, screenwriter Hanif Kureishi and collaborator-director Roger Michell.

Kureishi, whose credits include "My Beautiful Laundrette" and "My Son the Fanatic," has come up with a smartly written script that excels in character-based dialogue so tart it is as much fun to read on the page as it is to see performed. And director Michell — previously responsible for "Notting Hill" as well as "Persuasion," the best of the Jane Austen adaptations — knows how to produce exactly calibrated line readings that get all the juice out of deliciously offbeat lines like: "Oh, just kill them, kill the young, exterminate their disgusting happiness and hope."

The main attraction on screen, obviously, is the seven-time Oscar-nominated O'Toole, who at 74 uses a lifetime of talent, craft and simply living to turn the part of an aging actor who forms a connection with a young woman into a master class of lovely and seemingly effortless screen acting.

Equally impressive though easier to overlook is the work of Jodie Whittaker, who graduated from London's Guildhall School of Music & Drama just a year ago. She brings a deft ability to play all the at-times contradictory aspects of a constantly changing character that the film would be lost without.It's O'Toole's character, Maurice Russell, a London-based actor who considers himself "a little" famous, we meet first, and it is something of a shock. Given our collective memory of the O'Toole of "Lawrence of Arabia," it is wrenching to see Maurice sitting on his bed, rumpled and fragile and without the will to get up until he slaps himself hard and says, "Come on, old man."


But though Maurice is having trouble with his prostate and is reduced to playing dead people on TV ("typecasting," jokes his ex-wife Valerie, an incandescent Vanessa Redgrave), he is still very much of a charmer, someone with a face that loves the limelight and eyes that retain a bright rakish light.

<
Maurice is in the habit of spending time with fellow codger Ian (Leslie Phillips), comparing pills and trading sharp cracks. Then his friend announces that his grandniece is coming to London from the north to help look after him. Or so he thinks.For Jessie (Whittaker) turns out to be no one's idea of a caregiver, least of all her own. Surly, self-centered and willful, a prodigious drinker with a coarse tongue, she is the type that soon makes Ian "scream for euthanasia."


However, Maurice, who considers himself "a scientist of the female heart," is intrigued.

It is a given that Maurice and Jessie, who he soon dubs "Venus," are going to get along better than either one of them anticipates, but almost nothing else about their relationship goes the way either they or audiences can anticipate.For one thing, Maurice is too old to have anything more than what he calls "a theoretical interest" in the opposite sex, but that theoretical interest takes some potent turns. Also, neither one of this pair is a noticeably sweet person, and that shared prickliness and the bite of Kureishi's writing keep things from getting anywhere close to maudlin or sentimental.

Finally, it becomes evident that what motivates Maurice is not lechery but a kind of yearning envy of Jessie's youth and a longing for his own. Both Maurice and Jessie are, to borrow a phrase from the script, "in the habit of putting their own pleasure first," and to see them first clash and then go beyond their difficulties is, frankly, a marvel.


kenneth.turan@latimes.com"Venus." MPAA rating: R, for language, some sexual content and brief nudity.

Running time: 1 hour, 35 minutes.

Tuesday, June 05, 2007

Interesting: Carl Rogers



(1902-1987)
Core of Personality

I. Core Tendency: The tendency to actualize one's inherent potentialities. This potential exists in all living organisms, even plants. Humans possess an additional form - the attempt to actualize the self - called self-actualization.
II. Core Characteristics:

A. Self: The person's conscious sense of who and what you are. Is available to awareness, although not always in awareness.
1. Gradually emerges through experiences with verbal labels such as "I" or "Me".
2. Phenomenological Reality: A person's private perception of reality (whether or not it agrees with objective reality). Experience is the highest authority. If you think you are not good-looking or smart, this is part of your self concept regardless of reality.

B. Need for Positive Regard: the universal need for acceptance, love, and approval from others. Particularly important during infancy.

C. Need for Positive Self-Regard: When acceptance and approval come from within the individual and forms part of the self-concept.
Development

Rogers does not specify any developmental stages, but does make some comments. Of basic importance is the fact that one's inherent potentialities are genetically determined, while the self-concept is socially determined. Thus, there is the possibility of a difference between the two. The important influences are:
I. Conditional Positive Regard: The granting of love and approval only when behaving in accordance with parent's wishes, or when parents withdraw love if the child misbehaves. This leads to: II. Conditions of Worth (similar to superego): the individual's belief that he/she is worthy of affection only when expressing desirable behaviors.
III. Incongruence: When there is a split between organismic experience and self-concept.

A. Prevents self-actualization.
B. Leads to defensive behavior. Major defenses:
1. Denial (repression)
2. Distortion


IV. Unconditional Positive Regard: The granting of love and approval regardless of individual's behavior. Does not mean lack of restraint. If a child runs out in front of a truck, stop him and tell him it is dangerous, but don't spank him and tell him he is a bad, evil boy. (Rogers is against punishment as a means of controlling behavior).


V. Congruence: When the self concept is in agreement with inherent potentialities and there are minimal conditions of worth. Leads to openness to experience and a fulling functioning person.


Periphery of Personality


Rogers discussed only two broad types: one where the self-actualizing tendency is vigorously functioning and one where it is not.


I. Fully Functioning Person: The ideal - has received unconditional positive regard, has few conditions of worth, and has congruence between self & potentialities.

Characteristics:
A. Openness to Experience - opposite of defensiveness. Is reflective and much emotional depth (for both pleasure and pain).
B. Existential Living: Living fully in each and every moment. The absence of rigidity, is flexible, adaptable, and spontaneous.
C. Organismic Trusting:


1. Intuitive living: the ability to accept information from all bases.
2. Experience is the highest authority. If it feels right, it probably is (better than conscious thought - very different from Freud).

D. Experiential Freedom - the freedom to choose among alternatives.
E. Creativity: The ability to produce new and effective ideas and things.
II. Maladjusted Person: Has received conditional positive regard and developed conditions of worth. There is incongruence between self and potentialities.


Characteristics:
A. Defensive Living - Not open to experience
B. Live According to preconceived plan - generally laid down by parents.
C. Disregards organism - not intuitive
D. Feels manipulated - not free to choose
E. Common and conforming


III. Other comments:


A. Comparison of ideals. There is a certain amount of selfishness in Roger's theory. One critic has called Humanistic Psychology "the narcissism of our culture" - that we are so lost in self love that we fail to relate to outside reality. For example, compare the following ideal adjectives for Adler and Rogers:


1. Adler - responsible, capable, committed, effective, adaptable to social realities, social interest.
2. Rogers - experiential richness, flexibility, range of living, immediacy, change spontaneity.
B. Four characteristics of successful therapists. Rogers believed that these characteristics of the person doing therapy were more important than the therapist's philosophy or technique. Incidently, research supports this position.


1. Congruence: Good therapists can't be phoney; they must be able to relate to others honestly and sincerely. They don't have to be perfect, but can't be defensive when relating to others. Can't play games with clients.
2. Empathy: Must be able to put yourself in your client's shoes. Must be accurate empathy - not just "Yeah, I know what you are feeling, because I...".
3. Learn from Client: Good therapists can shut up and listen. Therapy is a two-way street, and the therapist should benefit from therapy also. Rogers always did 12 - 20 hrs. of therapy/ week.
4. Unconditional Positive Regard: You must genuinely like the client. You do not have to approve of his behavior, but must be able to separate the sins from the sinner. (Incidently, in seeking out a therapist, make sure you get this feeling).

Rematch


J made quite a comeback yesterday - 2 - 1 - impressive shot J, but I took the championship at 3-2.

Have suggested that dad goes to see An Inconvenient Truth. Would be amazing to convince him to combine all his travels with photographing disappearing icesheets (in Iceland, Alaska, Antarctica) and combining it with climbing some of the highest mountains (photographing receding glaciers), and then reporting, and doing presentations on the findings. Talk about a meaningful, important way to be spending your time.

It's raining today in Bloem. Eyes hurting from too much screentime. Probably need to be exercising more.

I'm playing Frik on Friday. Hopefully won't get slaughtered again.

Pfizer to go bankrupt?


Meningitis: FG sues Pfizer $700bn * Over deaths of 200 children in 1996
By Ise-Oluwa IgePosted to the Web: Tuesday, June 05, 2007



ABUJA—The Federal Government has sued the world largest pharmaceutical company, Pfizer, before a Federal high court sitting in Abuja for allegedly maiming or and killing in 1996, not fewer than 200 children afflicted in Kano state by bacterial meningitis through alleged illegal experimentation of its products, Trovafloxacin Mesylate, (Trovan) on them.


The government is asking the court to award $700billion damages against the pharmaceutical firm.If the damages is awarded, it is capable of closing down the operation of the pharmaceutical firm.In the writ of summons filed at the registry of the high court, nine other persons including the medical personnel that allegedly administered the Trovan on the victims for the purpose of testing the potency of the drug, were named as co-defendants.


They include Pfizer Nigeria Limited, William Steere, Samuel Ohanbuwa, A Dogunro, Isa Dutse, Scott Hopkin, Mike Dunne, Debra Williams and Robert Buhl.But the management of the Pfizer International Incorporated has served a notice through its counsel, Chief Afe Babalola (SAN) that it would challenge the competence of the entire case and collapse the claim by the Federal Government.


Chief Afe Babalola (SAN) who appeared personally in the case yesterday also requested for an accelerated hearing of the case.He particularly said in court yesterday that the damages being sought by the Federal Government was more than its annual budget and that it should not have any problem with the accelerated hearing of the case so that it could claim the sought damages.
The trial high court judge, Justice Babs Kuewumi hearing the case has granted the request for accelerated hearing of the suit and has ordered the government to furnish the firm. all relevant papers in the matter.


The matter is scheduled for mention on June 26, this year while full blown trial kicks off in July. The background of the case as captured by the statement of claim filed by the Federal Government was that on or about the month of April 1996, there was an epidemic of bacterial meningitis, measles and cholera in parts of Northern Nigeria particularly Kano State and some of the victims and/or patients were receiving medical attention at the Infectious Diseases Hospital (IDH) through the joint efforts of the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Kano State Government of Nigeria.


The joint efforts of the Federal Government and the Kano State Government to combat and contain the epidemic were complemented by the humanitarian assistance and supplies donated by Non- governmental Organizations including Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), the Nobel Prize-winning humanitarian relief organization also known as “Doctors Without Borders”.
The epidemic was extremely ravaging and as such there was a limitation of space and resources which limitation led to MSF setting up its tent on the grounds of the IDH from where it attended to the patients and/or victims.


The Federal Government contends that in the midst of the epidemic, Pfizer, acting by itself and through its agents, devised a scheme under which it misrepresented, concealed and failed to disclose its primary motive in seeking to participate in giving care to the victims of the epidemic in Kano .

A Forum of Fools


If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing – Anatole France

Privacy is an important concept now, not only in terms of security, but in the context of identity theft, abuse etc. Blogs present a difficult case for a public now able to reach the world in seconds with damning evidence, or equally damaging but false and libelous information.


The internet is like a lot like money, you can use it for good or ill. In both cases, unfortunately human nature indicates an obvious predisposition. By far the majority of internet traffic is to pornographic websites. And by far the majority of financial resources remains in the hands of a fraction of the world’s rich, while an entire continent of people (Africa) starves to death.

The internet has recently become even more popular, as bloggers and those wanting to network connect with others on Facebook and Myspace etc. Blogs are another example of the poor quality not only of writing but also the thinking of the average person. Forums present another alternative for people to discuss and share issues.

Some Forums are based on blogs, such as the inane mushypeasontoast.blogspot.com (now featured as a ‘cool’ website in Cosmopolitan). Better ones include theoildrum.com, where comments are responded to, but even here the moderator is necessarily the owner of the forum, and the decider of what content to broadcast. At least theoildrum.com’s message is constructive, intelligent and useful. In this sense, once again, it is outnumbered by the sheer amount of brainless garbage circulating in cyberspace. Yes, the internet attracts spam, and junkmail and also, unfortunately, the braindead.

Silence is foolish if we are wise, but wise if we are foolish – Charles Caleb Colton

One particular forum I’d like to identify here is http://www.thehubsa.co.za/. Recently in South Africa there was a lot of chest beating over a rugby player wearing a t-shirt with the worlds: Jesus is King. Especially on interactive news sites, many comments were made. What I noticed in many cases was that sometimes 100% of comments were identical, if not 100% identical. I am not sure what the point is for large groups of people to convey something they feel, when so many others obviously feel the same way. Is it a sense of security that what they hope and feel is echoed by others?

The reason I signed up on The Hub was to address a serious concern I had with a local cycling body that fraudulently claimed I was not a member, and then would not respond to my attempts to communicate with themselves and others to address the issue. An important point to make it that unlike almost all the avatars using The Hub, I signed up as myself, providing my real name, and location. I found myself immediately under attack by two avatars, and subsequently discovered that although I didn’t know who they were, they knew me. One, an avatar called Man With No Name I’d studied with at university, the other, Psycho, was someone I often cycled with.

After plenty of one-sided name-calling and insults, an avatar called Popeye posted private information as a New Topic, and then using google, attempted to profile and then belittle me. Naturally the aforementioned avatars were amongst the most frequent responders to this denigrating content. Peculiarly, the administrators of the site allowed this invasion of privacy to happen.

The nature of forums allows individuals to hide behind pseudonyms and post whatever garbage he or she feels like espousing. Unfortunately it's not a phenomena unique to The Hub. – comment made by an avatar called The Thug

Trackz was another quiet avatar that spoke up at this point:

Its important to follow the rules of the forum ...
... but I do support Sunblock [my avatar] in his/her quest to take a stand whether you agree or disagree ... freedom of speech is the foundation of our democracy! Any healthy organisation/sport/company has people that challenge the status quo ... albeit controversial at times!
As for thehubsa ... as a newbie I find some of the personal attacks on a public forum in much worse taste ...


But the worst personal attack was yet to come. With that helpless lust for blood that overtakes so many people, other avatars were attracted, not to the issues I had raised, but merely to the smear-fest. One avatar in particular, bmw-driver, posted a comment in response to a host of criticisms towards me with step by step suggestions on how to commit suicide.

An avatar called bobbie responded as follows:

As a mom with a teenager and two small daughters I take huge offense to this suggestion as to "How to commit suicide". Are you completely out of your mind? Is there not enough violence and crime around us without you making ridiculous and wild suggestions like this?

I hope you have the guts to edit your post and delete point number 2 - I think this is completely unacceptable and has gone way too far.


The moderator then asked for the same thing, and bmw-driver duly deleted his suggestion. The moderator, Cruxpearl, then finally closed the link, with this comment:

… the Hub has become a cesspool of anger, filth an sick comments, certainly not the fun place where like minded cyclist started off coming together to share enjoyed memories and exchange advice and information.

This Topic is also now closed....


Over the weekend, with someone having posted a photograph of Psycho, I called him up, and asked him a few questions, made a few clarifications and then particularly about the public demonstration of bravado (he said he would beat me up if he saw me). Naturally he was very different, even apologetic over the phone.
Subsequently I was banned from the forum, with a farewell message from my varsity mate, someone who sent me a personal message of apology at one point, but it was in the manner of ‘I will apologise if you do’. Under the avatar Man With No Name my ‘pal’ wrote the following:
To be very honest, my irritation with your attitude and comments got the better of me and I regret that.’
Banning is difficult to enforce though. I signed on as a new avatar under a different name but I realized I had nothing to say to these foolish, foolish people.

Wise men talk because they have something to say. Fools talk because they have to say something - Plato

Monday, June 04, 2007








SA Cycle Champions in Bloem


South Africa’s best cyclists converge on the Free State, but the result is a mixed bag

It is obvious that the local officials went to a lot of trouble to pull off a successful event. Today, during the event, I noticed officials at various intersections verbally informing motorists and cyclists how to avoid each other.

On my way home on the eve of the road championships, I noticed that some of the turns on the cycle course were far too dangerous to include in such an important race. A good example is the cruel left hander into Olympus.

I also expected carnage on Sunday as traffic would have converged on the tight turn at the Berg en Dal church (at the roundabout on the lower end of Albrecht street). The officials can be credited with closing off the initial slipway turn into Olympus, and for making arrangements with the church in Albrecht street to have no morning services.


Even so, I would have liked to have seen that particular circle and several other roads, like Lucas Steyn, closed off altogether. When I drove up I encountered a train of cyclists in the right hand lane and only saw a cyclist at the last moment riding just off the centre of the road. Later in the day I saw that some cyclists were going up the left lane, others the right lane, some up the centre, with the result that no one knew – neither cyclists nor drivers – where they ought to have been.

While Sunday presented sunny if somewhat blustery conditions, the weather was less benign for the rest of the championship. The same can be said for some of the officials. What is noteworthy is David George’s incredible victory – his fourth – in the elite men’s individual time trial. George finished in a time of 50 minutes, 26 seconds, just 8 seconds ahead of James Perry, with Nick White third in 51:39. Peculiarly, George was asked to start first when the convention in cycling is that the slowest rider leaves first. This is the standard applied in all races, including the prologue and time trials at the Tour de France.




It has to be said as well that for a rider who is hoping to win, he really needs to ride behind at least one other rider. The rider in front acts as a carrot, an incentive. To ride out first will almost certainly impact on a rider’s motivational levels on the road. And everybody knows the time trial in incredibly tough of the body.

The time trial can also be excruciatingly difficult in terms of mental endurance as well. So, to make matters worse, just before the halfway turnaround point, a flag waving official indicated to David George to turn around, and he did so, and began the chase back. Fortunately George realized almost immediately it must have been an error, he slowed down again and turned, and then turned around at the proper co-ordinate. It is difficult to convey the agony of such a mistake, when the rider is making a supreme effort to make every second count on the bike, and riding to the limits of his ability.

The reason for the blunder is not certain, but Dave Bellairs, second in charge of FSA apologized to David George for the mistake. It is a credit to George that he was still able to win, even if by a narrow margin of just 8 seconds. One wonders what would have happened if James Perry had beaten David George, or if George had turned where he was told to turn and possibly disqualified as a result.

In an earlier article (Free State Cycling A Shambles) I alluded to this tendency of local officials to daydream on the job. In a local championship event I was allowed to ride 10km beyond the 100km route’s turnaround beacon, and then turned around eventually having found no one beyond Dewetsdorp despite many orange beacons further along the route. That said, the volunteers were wide awake and competent that I saw today.

Meanwhile Ronel van Wyk achieved a milestone by reaching a tally of 300 cycling victories by winning the elite ladies time trial. Today I saw a banner tied to a tree in Heuwilsig with words to this effect: Come on Ronel, #301.

The Road championships presented the elites with a very arduous 197km of riding over a hilly course, consisting of innumerable 16.4km laps. The route was very spectator friendly, but I counted only a few handfuls of supporters here and there, and many of these people seemed from out of town anyway. Bloemfontein is one of those cities where you can hold an event like SA Championships in the middle of suburbia, and the local residents wouldn’t realize it.

In Port Elizabeth last year I also noticed very few spectators, but then it was held beyond the cities limits. At the very least I would like to anticipate more fun riders taking an interest in these events, but I think the local cycling bodies and the City of Bloemfontein needs to market the event a lot more in future. It is bizarre that the OFM Classic (in November) for example appeared to have a much steadier support base, and a sort of carnival atmosphere, than SA Cycling Championships. Anywhere else, London, Auckland, Sydney, Munich, Boulder, perhaps even Cape Town, the streets would have been filled with flocks of curious people. But I’m sure those cities would also promote the event, both to locals and those coming from out of town.

I think what’s needed is a more inclusive approach, not only towards cyclists, but also towards the public. Such a big event should also be used to convey the message that cyclists would really like the co-operation and friendship of motorists, rather than an aggressive facing off. Perhaps the public could be invited to test drive certain vehicles in the train behind the riders and team car, just to include the public more.


Conceivably it’s no accident that the public more or less ignores cycling events. Because they don’t understand the sport, and are not invited to understand it (through information-rich articles or inserts in the weekend newspapers, and festivities surrounding the event) the response is indifference. Our local newspaper (as far as I know) didn’t publish a timetable for the various races, so that’s something else to consider.

These are important suggestions, because we have to notice what impact our ideas, our actions have on other people with different ideas. I noticed a driver this morning bellowing at an official, and red faced, and obviously very irritated that he had to share the road the whole day with a lot of cyclists. But then if route markers are planted on your lawn without your permission, or you’re driving and suddenly find both sides of a double lane road blocked off, shuddering with red and white tape, without anticipating this, it is likely to irritate. Even so, I feel it is a shame.

To remedy this I feel we need some innovative ideas on how to solve this obvious disconnect. In my view communication, and in particular various forms of marketing, even branding the sport of cycling, will do a lot to improve the image and receptivity towards it. And I think it needs to be received better in order to grow. In France cycling is a national pastime, celebrated with wine, and picnics, and outings into the country. Here it is still perceived as a nuisance. But then South Africa, and here in the Free State in particular, we are still a long way away from France.
For all the time trial and road championship results, visit www.cyclesa.com

Predictions for The Road to a Home



We’re making our home into a gallows

During the Ice Ages, measured over hundreds of thousands of years, the levels of CO2 fluctuated in our atmosphere from 170-280 parts per million. In 2005, the warmest year on record at the time, the Earth’s CO2 levels stood at 370. This represented the top of an anomalous near vertical line on the graph, and since 2005, this figure has continued to increase at an alarming rate.



If the ten warmest years on record mean one thing it is this: the next ten years will also be the ten warmest, with each subsequent year likely to be somewhat warmer than the last. The alarm bells begin to chime when we consider the possibility of a second decade of continuous increases in global warming, possibly even a third and fourth and fifth. In such a scenario, the weather will be an adversary capable of substantially altering the number and quality of the human population around the planet.

One factor provides a measure – albeit an indirect one – of the impact of climate change. This is through the impact of food prices. Crops have become more difficult to sustain. Large numbers of livestock and poultry are kept alive at greater cost, and with greater and greater difficulty. And right now, we’re at the beginning of an inflationary trend (based on food prices) not just in your country, but throughout the world. We’re also seeing the prices of many other inputs rising: from commodities to energy. Everything is going to be more expensive in the future, with climate change driving many of our costs. We will experience what is called a supply crunch in many aspects of our lives. The reason for this is simple: too many people, too many users straining the capacity of a finite system.



When that system breaks, we will see all our innovative efficiencies bounce back as gross inefficiencies. We experience this whenever our car breaks down, or our phone doesn’t work, or the lights go out. Our level of helplessness can be quite chronic. And so the casualties will be untold numbers of those users that caused the systemic failure. The crash will be similar to the conventional use of the word to describe motor vehicle accidents and the sudden failure of a computer program to respond. It will manifest essentially as a sudden and unexpected Disconnect – but from major systems, from food, to energy, to money.

A crash implies the immediate ceasing of a system to function. Few, if any people, anticipate an abrupt change, not for the climate, or for a stock market slaughter, or anything else. But then few people even ponder the world beyond the pursuit of a job, a salary, or the next entertainment. Our economies are based to a large extent on stock markets, but stock markets – while somewhat delusional and disconnected from actual value – are tethered to some bottom line realities, even if it is just sentiment. When the market has an epiphany about the world, when it realizes what is already self-evident, the bubble that is sustainable growth will simply burst: massive quantities of wealth will be wiped out, as is the natural order of things, and will portend similar systemic crashes in other areas.

It is a terrible realization to wake up in the morning and discover that the vague impulses of disaster flitting through one’s brain are not a dream. That yesterday’s reality is real for today, and will remain with us for the rest of our lives.

But we do not awaken in the morning, wherever we are in the world, wary of a second 9/11, wary that every Northern Hemisphere summer may bring about the destruction of another major city by a Category 5 Storm. We have absorbed the horrors of AIDS, the threat of H5N1, and the symptoms of already chronic climate change, and continued about our daily business. We have breakfast and go out to our jobs as though we expect the world we live in to be there – a pleasant home for human beings – for the next 10 years. If you think about it, you probably expect the planet to sustain us at least for the course of your lifetime. You believe you will see your children going to school, and graduating. Do you know that that is no longer a certainty we can take for granted.

If we consider chronic climate change, and look at what Al Gore touched upon in his excellent presentation, An Inconvenient Truth, we have to acknowledge that we are already very very deep, and very very far, into unchartered territory. CO2 levels are currently far beyond record levels. There’s no surprise there, but the record goes further than 10 000 years, beyond the last ice age and the ice age before that, beyond 100 000 years ago, beyond 400 000 years ago. As far back as we can see based on ice core samples, we are not merely double these extreme levels, but treble them, and if we could continue the way we are to 2050 we would see CO2 levels ascend vertically on a graph to around 5 times the highest levels ever recorded.

From far away the graph resembles the letter T lying on its head, with the right hand side chopped away. The average is maintained, is stable, for hundreds of thousands of years, but when we reach our time, and our generation, this millennium, the spike breaks away from the average and rockets into a vertical ascent. It is not irrational to look at such a graph that is collated from a timeline of data that is at least 50 000 times longer than the lifecycle of that creature –the creature responsible for these chronic changes – (a human being), and be humbled, reduced and even frightened by what we have achieved. We are now experiencing the rapid adjustment of the Earth’s temperature to record CO2 levels, and year after year the averages are going up, new records are set, so that each year becomes the warmest on record. If one extrapolates that data, it should be already obvious that conditions will continue on their trend through 2008, 2009, 2010… What can we expect the weather to be like 10 years from now, in 2017, or five years after that, in 2022?

In just these 3 years that lie ahead of us, we need to brace ourselves for extreme natural events. We cannot predict what they will be, but we can be sure they will be catastrophic. We know to expect more powerful city destroying hurricanes all over the world. We know we can expect more of the kind of heat waves and floods we have seen, and pestilences and insect plagues in our immediate future. And we know while the world population climbs towards 7 billion, food shortages and water scarcity will begin to manifest in a major way. Food shortages will become normal in our lifetime. But all of this will be exacerbated by the reversal of a condition that has allowed us to live so comfortably for little more than a 100 years. It has been in the era of cheap oil that we have been able to redistribute so much CO2 into the atmosphere. In fact, it is courtesy of oil and other fossil fuels that took millions of years to create, that man was able to unbind that energy in just 2 generations. Our efficiency at doing so has jolted our atmosphere, and we have yet to see what electric responses from the sky are in store for us. But it is abundantly clear that a Reckoning is imminent – the response of the world to our burning already half of an entire planet’s fossil fuels – resources of carbon that took millennia of living creatures on Earth to deposit - in a blink of geological time, we have sparked these liquid-petrified forests into smoke. The anomaly that allowed this to happen on such a grand scale is us, and many of us holding the keys to machines that burn barrels of the stuff every single day.

Mankind has maintained a fairly stable population on the planet for a long period, and just as the graph for human population spikes upward in the last 200 years to reach a figure several times the average (from less than 1 to around 6 billion), so CO2 has followed the same trend, as each human being has become a user of resources, but also a fire starter, a user and converter whose life is based on accelerating this process of conversion – of sun stored energy fired into the atmosphere as a warm gas.

In plain language then, if the summertime in conditions in countries as far apart as South Africa and South Korea are equally sweltering, and frankly, unbearable, what can we expect year upon year upon year? The reason I ask these questions is because I found myself in both these countries thinking: “If it gets just a few degrees warmer than this, people are going to start dying here.”

Naturally, those devices we might want to rely on to defend ourselves against the weather (air conditioners for summer, any heating devices for winter) simply produce additional heat, and consume additional energy resources when we simply cannot afford to be consuming any more than we are.

Can we realistically imagine the Earth as a place for our children 10 years from now? No. Climate change is one argument, but the use of nuclear weapons in our lifetimes is virtually certain. The odds favour the likelihood of a nuclear event in the not too distant future. Now it becomes clear the level of insanity that has taken over our species. When people everywhere should be making radical changes to their lives, in fact they are not. In the back of our minds we are aware of side issues, but perhaps we put it in a box marked ‘To Do’, but we continue ‘To Do Something Else’ in the moments we have available to ourselves. Perhaps we feel that nuclear weapons don’t exist in the real world, only in Hollywood movies, and we’ll always have a James Bond to save us at the last minute. No.

If you are reading this, you should be aware that just weather conditions alone will become very uncomfortable for you and those around you in your lifetime. It has already started, and 2008 will see hotter summers wherever you are, hotter than we’ll see this year, and 2009 will be even hotter still. We’ll report on the changes happening, rather as commentators report on a football match. Our dismay and discomfort will turn to horror. We can do an analysis after various spectacular moves, having seen breathtaking demos of this planet’s atmospheric power. We can make predictions, but essentially, we will be bracing ourselves for a score. In the same way that we score the number of hurricanes in a year, or note record temperatures or levels of rainfall, so we will get into the habit of watching a scorecard.
What we will experience though is no half time whistle, no end time whistle, in fact no reprieve at all. Probably, conditions will be worsening even into third and fourth and fifth generations. If you imagine the world will be something like it is today, wake up. The world will be entirely altered – ice caps will have disappeared, ski-resorts will be abandoned on mountains, massive relocations will have taken place. And dislocated crowds, unused to inconvenience, will test the tolerance of local communities, as we saw with the exculpated residents of New Orleans. It is when this dislocation leads to competition of limited resources – and weather chaos will eventually cause massive crop failures – that wars will erupt.

In the near future we will experience such a chaos of converging catastrophe that having a war – humans fighting humans – will be particularly ludicrous. Also, in our lifetimes, we will see the end of religion: Either a savior of the world will pluck the saved in a rapture of souls, or gravity will continue to exert itself on all people equally (whatever they believe), and we will all remain here to deal with the consequences of our actions. But we will see religion finally tested on the rock and fire of a furious planet and our own desire to live will be weathered and broken and beaten back. A fraction of the people alive today will survive, and in conditions of spiraling austerity.

We are on a road, whether we like it or not, to the new home we have fashioned for ourselves.
It is completely rational to suggest that there is nothing people can do now; irrevocable damage has already been perpetrated on the planet’s weather systems. These still need to be completely borne out. So we have these options:
Either party like there is no tomorrow, or change your life completely, and immediately.
Choosing the latter will mean quitting your job for something more meaningful and practical, not having children, no longer buying or driving in cars (or flying), eating a fraction of meat (based on human dental and digestive design) and no longer participating in the buying or building of houses. What is insanity is to continue living the way we do, as though we anticipate another 5 years of the same, perhaps 10, or even 20. It’s not going to happen.

We will soon see the global weather anomaly turning to calamity, and then:
The End of Entertainment. Nuclear War. The End of Religion. There will be hunger and starvation, and fire in the sky. The sun will burn the Earth, then flood it, then freeze it in a combination that will test the resilience of all living things to breaking (extinction) point.

In the trilogy the Lord of the Rings, darkness had to be faced. But they had the assurance at least that they could face their fate in a world that had, at least, reasonably fair weather. We won’t have that. Against the backdrop of ever worsening weather chaos, floods, droughts and storms, we will have to find a way to live in the world. Our lives, already unstable, from here on out will become even more unbalanced. What remains is a slippery road and at the end of it a home underwater with its roof on fire. And somewhere on that road we will have to find the ring. We’ll need to cast the ring into Mount Doom; it is the ring that binds us all. A ring of voracious greed. Before that step though, we will reap the whirlwind; we will be consumed as a natural balancing consequence of our mad consumption, and the men of the world will be chopped down like wheat.

And tomorrow morning, whether we do something or nothing, the same slippery road to the sunken, burning house, will beckon once again. The light over our road is fading. And yet, it is a journey we must take. The more we delay taking the road to a home, and a home worth having, the fewer choices we will have at the end of the day.

Friday, June 01, 2007

SA’s cyclists in Bloemfontein this weekend

As I was about to step into our offices today, I noticed a car on Nelson Mandela drive hauling a bunch of shiny Cervelo bicycle frames. It’s that time of year again, when the best cyclists in the country go head to head first in Time Trial tussles, and then two days later, over several up and down laps in the Road Championships.

The field this year is the biggest in years. But SA’s this year takes place against a background of controversy too. 2007 is also the first year that CSA plans to make their licenses compulsory for all fun rides. This means that riders who turn up for races now have to join a club first, pay their fees there, and then make applications through these organs for a CSA license. Many cyclists are unhappy with this level of control.

For the full story click on the title of this post.


VET MEN 35-39 (20km)

PLACE RIDER NAME PROVINCE RUN TIME OFF LEADER

1 654 PHEIFFER LUKE WP 00:27:06.8 00:00:00.0

2 660 VAN GELDER DONOVAN KZN 00:27:08.2 00:00:01.4

3 656 PRITCHARD CHARLES CG 00:27:09.5 00:00:02.7

4 650 MOOLMAN WERNER KZN 00:27:10.9 00:00:04.1

5 667 LABUSCHAGNE JOHAN CG 00:27:31.5 00:00:24.7

6 668 KLOPPER KOOS GN 00:27:44.6 00:00:37.8

7 666 WILLIAMS LEE ANDREW CG 00:27:47.4 00:00:40.6

8 655 PIENAAR FREDDIE GN 00:28:10.6 00:01:03.8

9 629 PIEHL ANDRE CG 00:28:30.5 00:01:23.7

10 639 HARMSE WERNER SG 00:28:48.8 00:01:42.0


VET MEN 30-34

PLACE RIDER NAME PROVINCE RUN TIME OFF LEADER

1 577 HARVEY CRAIG CG 00:40:20.8 00:00:00.0

2 574 LABUSCHAGNE DAVID CG 00:41:21.1 00:01:00.3

3 561 FOURIE PETRUS JOHANNES FSS 00:43:37.5 00:03:16.7

4 568 HYAM DAVID EP 00:43:47.5 00:03:26.7

5 571 PRETORIUS COEN FSS 00:43:59.6 00:03:38.8

6 572 O'REILLY DONOVAN GEORGE BOR 00:44:13.9 00:03:53.1

7 565 CAMPBELL GLEN CRAIG CG 00:45:04.1 00:04:43.3

8 564 DAVIDS ABDUL QUAYUM WP 00:46:31.9 00:06:11.1

9 562 FOURIE JEAN FSS 00:47:05.9 00:06:45.1

10 566 BÖHMER LEON MPU 00:47:10.8 00:06:50.0

11 569 JACOBS AWIE BOR 00:48:08.4 00:07:47.6

12 560 STROEBEL CORNELIUS NW 00:50:56.9 00:10:36.1


Last year's results over 30km for 30-34 ...

Hypomimia

Hypomimia, a Medical sign, is a reduced degree of facial expression.

It can be caused by motor impairment (for example, weakness or paralysis of the facial muscles), as in Parkinson's disease, or by other causes, like psychological or psychiatric factors (for example, if a patient actually doesn't feel emotions, and thus doesn't show any expression).

Bradykinesia

Definition of Bradykinesia:

Slowed ability to start and continue movements, and impaired ability to adjust the body's position. Can be a symptom of neurological disorders*, particularly Parkinson's disease, or a side effect of medications.

The word bradykinesia is logically derived from two Greek roots: bradys, slow + kinesis, movement = slow movement, slow motion, slow moving.

*Can also be a symptom of going out on a weeknight and drinking peach-schnapps, whiskey, cider etc