Sunday, July 28, 2013
Sunday, July 21, 2013
The Economics of Climate Change - by Nick van der Leek
I prepared this presentation for the Symposium on Climate Change, held in June at the Oxford and Cambridge Club in central London. If you'd like me to speak on this topic at an event or relevant seminar, please get in touch.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Why Christianity is Crazy
Don't make the mistake of thinking the word 'crazy' is used in the same
way to dismiss something or someone we don't understand. No, the word
is used in the same way we talk of a behaviour that is literally
'insanity'.
CS Lewis, a famous Christian (and author of such questionable drivel as 'The Screwtape Letters') once wrote: "Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse." It's possible that a Christ-like figure did exist at one time, Tacitus certainly references one, a man who was unjustly crucified, who then gained a following in Rome that persisted after his death. It is interesting that even Tacitus called it right in those early days. Besides using the word 'mischief' to describe the motives of this new belief system he refers to it as ' the pernicious superstition'. If you're too lazy to look the word up, 'pernicious' means dangerous, harmful or damaging, and at a time that Rome was trying to create civilisation and laws, here was a system to undermine that civilisation. Tacitus goes even further to call this group 'convicted...[for their] hatred against mankind'.
And this is my point. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son...right? At the same time, Christians are exhorted to turn their back on the world, for the world belongs to the devil, to turn our backs on our animal nature's and focus on things beyond the Earthly realm. We're not animals and God forbid, we are not descended from animals. We are not part of the world, we must in fact be apart from it. Believers are taught to hate the world, and worldliness. Does that include travelling, and finding out about other countries and ideas? Should we hate that too?
If you still think it's too extreme a point, consider that Christians insist that evolution is just a theory; it hasn't been proved. It's an interesting hypocrisy, because the evidence for Christianity's case is one or two paragraphs of writing in Genesis, it's oldest books, no witness account exist whatsoever. In terms of Jesus' very existence there is scant evidence either .ie nothing written by scribes in Jesus' supposed lifetime, and no artifacts. Of course evolution is a very cohesive explanation, and the evidence is abundant for the nature of how life came to be on Earth, and especially, an explanation for how Speciation took place. It is certainly a better explanation than Christianity's, which cites a 6 day creation paragraph as sufficient and a fable about dust and ribs coming to life and a garden and tree story borrowed from the mythical literature that belongs to all of humanity, rather than being specific to Judaism. The rejection of the science of evolution in fact aligns perfectly with believers rejection of life as a whole. Their rejection of evolution is premised on one idea: God made life, as opposed to the suggestion from evolutionary theory - that life spontaneously comes into existence, as we see on islands previously exploded into ash by volcanoes, become sterile and are then seeded by the life from nearby oceans washing ashore. A believer sitting on such an island suddenly seeing a flower pop its head through volcanic topsoil may see this as a miracle, a signal that the creator snapped his (but not her) finger, and indeed it is a testament to life 'finding a way', life's evolved resilience and persistence. The insistence that 'god did it', that 'god does everything' is necessary to give him both authority and responsibility for the believer's life. To deny or question this absolute omnipotence threatens the believers own perceived, transferred powers to his perceived all-powerful saviour.
Christians love to tell us that God loved the world so much he sent his son, who died for us. Thus, out of guilt, we owe a favour that was done before we were born... We must repay that favour with our lives, or at least, the intentions of our lives. We are asked to quite literally 'give your life to Jesus', and believers are happy to unthinkingly do so. Children in particular. It makes sense from a particularly sick line of reasoning. Why did God then love the world, if the men he saved he wanted to have them live in the world but ignore the world at the same time and focus only on him? Either vanity and egoism at its worst, or a sort of divine schizophrenia.
If you think the idea that Christians should reject the world and live apart from it is far fetched, consider the cults of Christianity that have evolved, starting with the Amish, and going via the Catholics all the way through to your most liberal Christians. What all these cults have in common in is that they despise those who are not Christians like themselves, including other Christians. By being insular, by devoting their days on earth to time in heaven, they develop a bitterness to imagined enemies, by calling themselves good, someone has to be evil, and probably, there needs to be an axis of evil. In this way you develop a deep-seated hatred for your fellow human beings, and also, for all life.
The heroism of Christianity then is based on renunciation; renunciation of this world, and this life, and all its satisfactions. If you're a Christian and you earn an income, you're expected to give some of it away. You're supposed to die to your life, as a sort of deposit into your life after death. Well, better hope there is one.
Ernest Becker, the Pulitzer Prize winning author of Escape From Evil (a book I highly recommend) calls Christianity and the ideas that flowed into it "an anti heroism by an animal to deny life in order to deny evil". It's a crazy psychology, but by accepting a few aspects of an insane idea, the whole madness probably makes some sense. For example, if you swallow the lie that you are part of the master race, it's easier to believe another group isn't, and then begin to act, to take your first step towards 'a final solution to the problem'. In other words, mass murder, a holocaust. Interestingly, evil comes about as a result of an idea how we think ourselves to be good, it seldom manifests from mere wickedness as many think. Large scale evil can only be perpetrated on the world when many groups buy into it, thus it must have an essence of being or seeming good, at least to the group. Make sense? In the same way, if you buy into the bull that we inherit original sin when we are born, 'we are born sinners', and the price of sin is death... (animals also die incidentally, are they sinners too?) and that we possess a soul that disembodies after we die, carries it's own identity book and is a sort of ghost with flesh that lives an afterlife, appreciates gold pavements and harp music and can supposedly vocalise songs of praise (I'd prefer to live eternity as a young person, than as a crooked old person with a walking stick and a dysfunctional sex drive). Or are all souls magically reset to a particular age? Christians don't like to think about the nuts and bolts of their faith, they prefer the self-reinforcing nature of it. After all, faith is the mirror we hold to ourselves. If God answers prayers, it's to the extent that our faith in our own immortality project is restored or viable. And you know what they say, when doomsday predictions don't come true, believers tend to have even more faith in them.
In the end, the madness of men who call themselves Christians is really their hatred for life, and for mankind. They reject it, they also reject themselves. They say they are better than their animal natures, even though they use the toilet, and are the first to applaud war and evangelism in the name of furthering their group identity and power upon the world.
The harm from this is that when you're not part of the world you're not invested in solving real problems, not in your own life and not in the life of your generation. You are especially reluctant to own up to those things you are responsible for. Thus your currency becomes one of denial on this planet, lying to oneself, in the name of a mansion in a netherworld which you get when you die. Climate change, species extinction, pollution, energy limits, environmental and other social issues...are God's problem. In the end the believer is like a selfish cancer. It is first and foremost interested in preserving and furthering itself. And in fully realising its 'reborn self' it acts exactly as a cancer does, killing its host, taking over as many cells as it can, and welcoming the end of the world as a some sort of fulfillment of its self destructive (anti-world) destiny. It's a crazy system and people who belong to it are madmen. If they don't recognise this, it's time everyone else does.
CS Lewis, a famous Christian (and author of such questionable drivel as 'The Screwtape Letters') once wrote: "Either this man was, and is, the Son of God, or else a madman or something worse." It's possible that a Christ-like figure did exist at one time, Tacitus certainly references one, a man who was unjustly crucified, who then gained a following in Rome that persisted after his death. It is interesting that even Tacitus called it right in those early days. Besides using the word 'mischief' to describe the motives of this new belief system he refers to it as ' the pernicious superstition'. If you're too lazy to look the word up, 'pernicious' means dangerous, harmful or damaging, and at a time that Rome was trying to create civilisation and laws, here was a system to undermine that civilisation. Tacitus goes even further to call this group 'convicted...[for their] hatred against mankind'.
And this is my point. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son...right? At the same time, Christians are exhorted to turn their back on the world, for the world belongs to the devil, to turn our backs on our animal nature's and focus on things beyond the Earthly realm. We're not animals and God forbid, we are not descended from animals. We are not part of the world, we must in fact be apart from it. Believers are taught to hate the world, and worldliness. Does that include travelling, and finding out about other countries and ideas? Should we hate that too?
If you still think it's too extreme a point, consider that Christians insist that evolution is just a theory; it hasn't been proved. It's an interesting hypocrisy, because the evidence for Christianity's case is one or two paragraphs of writing in Genesis, it's oldest books, no witness account exist whatsoever. In terms of Jesus' very existence there is scant evidence either .ie nothing written by scribes in Jesus' supposed lifetime, and no artifacts. Of course evolution is a very cohesive explanation, and the evidence is abundant for the nature of how life came to be on Earth, and especially, an explanation for how Speciation took place. It is certainly a better explanation than Christianity's, which cites a 6 day creation paragraph as sufficient and a fable about dust and ribs coming to life and a garden and tree story borrowed from the mythical literature that belongs to all of humanity, rather than being specific to Judaism. The rejection of the science of evolution in fact aligns perfectly with believers rejection of life as a whole. Their rejection of evolution is premised on one idea: God made life, as opposed to the suggestion from evolutionary theory - that life spontaneously comes into existence, as we see on islands previously exploded into ash by volcanoes, become sterile and are then seeded by the life from nearby oceans washing ashore. A believer sitting on such an island suddenly seeing a flower pop its head through volcanic topsoil may see this as a miracle, a signal that the creator snapped his (but not her) finger, and indeed it is a testament to life 'finding a way', life's evolved resilience and persistence. The insistence that 'god did it', that 'god does everything' is necessary to give him both authority and responsibility for the believer's life. To deny or question this absolute omnipotence threatens the believers own perceived, transferred powers to his perceived all-powerful saviour.
Christians love to tell us that God loved the world so much he sent his son, who died for us. Thus, out of guilt, we owe a favour that was done before we were born... We must repay that favour with our lives, or at least, the intentions of our lives. We are asked to quite literally 'give your life to Jesus', and believers are happy to unthinkingly do so. Children in particular. It makes sense from a particularly sick line of reasoning. Why did God then love the world, if the men he saved he wanted to have them live in the world but ignore the world at the same time and focus only on him? Either vanity and egoism at its worst, or a sort of divine schizophrenia.
If you think the idea that Christians should reject the world and live apart from it is far fetched, consider the cults of Christianity that have evolved, starting with the Amish, and going via the Catholics all the way through to your most liberal Christians. What all these cults have in common in is that they despise those who are not Christians like themselves, including other Christians. By being insular, by devoting their days on earth to time in heaven, they develop a bitterness to imagined enemies, by calling themselves good, someone has to be evil, and probably, there needs to be an axis of evil. In this way you develop a deep-seated hatred for your fellow human beings, and also, for all life.
The heroism of Christianity then is based on renunciation; renunciation of this world, and this life, and all its satisfactions. If you're a Christian and you earn an income, you're expected to give some of it away. You're supposed to die to your life, as a sort of deposit into your life after death. Well, better hope there is one.
Ernest Becker, the Pulitzer Prize winning author of Escape From Evil (a book I highly recommend) calls Christianity and the ideas that flowed into it "an anti heroism by an animal to deny life in order to deny evil". It's a crazy psychology, but by accepting a few aspects of an insane idea, the whole madness probably makes some sense. For example, if you swallow the lie that you are part of the master race, it's easier to believe another group isn't, and then begin to act, to take your first step towards 'a final solution to the problem'. In other words, mass murder, a holocaust. Interestingly, evil comes about as a result of an idea how we think ourselves to be good, it seldom manifests from mere wickedness as many think. Large scale evil can only be perpetrated on the world when many groups buy into it, thus it must have an essence of being or seeming good, at least to the group. Make sense? In the same way, if you buy into the bull that we inherit original sin when we are born, 'we are born sinners', and the price of sin is death... (animals also die incidentally, are they sinners too?) and that we possess a soul that disembodies after we die, carries it's own identity book and is a sort of ghost with flesh that lives an afterlife, appreciates gold pavements and harp music and can supposedly vocalise songs of praise (I'd prefer to live eternity as a young person, than as a crooked old person with a walking stick and a dysfunctional sex drive). Or are all souls magically reset to a particular age? Christians don't like to think about the nuts and bolts of their faith, they prefer the self-reinforcing nature of it. After all, faith is the mirror we hold to ourselves. If God answers prayers, it's to the extent that our faith in our own immortality project is restored or viable. And you know what they say, when doomsday predictions don't come true, believers tend to have even more faith in them.
In the end, the madness of men who call themselves Christians is really their hatred for life, and for mankind. They reject it, they also reject themselves. They say they are better than their animal natures, even though they use the toilet, and are the first to applaud war and evangelism in the name of furthering their group identity and power upon the world.
The harm from this is that when you're not part of the world you're not invested in solving real problems, not in your own life and not in the life of your generation. You are especially reluctant to own up to those things you are responsible for. Thus your currency becomes one of denial on this planet, lying to oneself, in the name of a mansion in a netherworld which you get when you die. Climate change, species extinction, pollution, energy limits, environmental and other social issues...are God's problem. In the end the believer is like a selfish cancer. It is first and foremost interested in preserving and furthering itself. And in fully realising its 'reborn self' it acts exactly as a cancer does, killing its host, taking over as many cells as it can, and welcoming the end of the world as a some sort of fulfillment of its self destructive (anti-world) destiny. It's a crazy system and people who belong to it are madmen. If they don't recognise this, it's time everyone else does.
Friday, July 12, 2013
What's wrong (and what's right) with my Introduction and first chapter - your thoughts? Crowdsource Attempt #3
This story is intentionally filled with anachronisms: it is one part Highlander, two parts Game of Thrones (but with only two and bit kingdoms duking it out) and three parts Ice Age, without the mammoths and iron age squirrel, but with plenty of fluid landscapes, esp0ecially those gripped by layers of ice and snow. There's also a nod to Limitless (in terms of the fluid intelligence on display by the Legolas-like protagonist Christopher Ulysses), and some of the drone-battle stuff you saw in the second Star Wars and the reboot of Jason Bourne. But it's its own story when it comes to how all this dystopian chaos resolves itself. I've looked to Hamlet and a variety of ancient writings for thematic guidance (The Iliad and the Odyssey), along with art, such as Dali's The Persistence of Memory, to unlock the secrets of blood memory, ancient remnants, genetic recollections. I'm trying to tell a great story, the story of man where he reaches the natural epilogue on this planet. It's not meant to be alarmist or depressing, but epic, heroic and faintly tragic. This I believe is adequate and in proportion to each of our lives. We emerge from the crowd, and slowly, as our survival propels us into the future, we become alienated and then alone. In the end, we find that in spite of family and friendships, we come to the end alone, and are left wondering - what can I leave behind when i am gone but memories, thoughts others may have of me. What if there are no others? And what happens after earth? Does it matter? More important does it work?
Two
wolves fight in each of us….Set 200 years into the future, the Great Burning
has left humankind on its last legs; our numbers crippled first by fire, and
the horrors and desolation of war, and then by the encroachment of cold, and walls of ice. As the new Ice Age marches relentlessly over
a new and medieval landscape, only two Houses remain viable, both in the far
North. They are the Black Wolves, a
society of hardened heroes and adventurers led by silver-haired Christopher
Ulysses, and the House of Light, a castle fortress engulfed by ice but
protecting the enormous, and deadly force that belongs to Ogilvie Skye. It is a time of hardship, no doubt, but some
abundance remains in the world. Some
animals have returned with a vengeance: owls and wolves, bears and hares, rats
and cats. But while some creatures have
begun to thrive in the near total absence of man, humanity, once the dominant
life form, is slipping. The apex
predator tumbles unchecked down the food chain, whilst wolves rise to claim the
empty wastes. Can our species arrest the
collapse of our civilisation?
Synopsis
Introduction
(Scrivener)
Unhappy
is the land that needs a hero
– Galileo
[July 28, 2212]
“Who’s there?”
My eyes travel along the windswept ramparts
to the archers, but my companion – a woman – directs me instead directly
beneath our station, to the frozen canvas. Far below these towers our master
has emerged without his war horse. He runs from the gate. The eagle on his arm flaps. The glossy mane and tail of his black wolf-collie
is a dancing comma fluttering fast across the page. The master’s silver hair flashes the cold
light of brooding clouds back at us, we who watch from his soaring dark walls.
As the great bird vaults into space, each great beat of its wings drawing it
higher into the Highland air, our master seems to run faster. He wears no armour
but that is hardly unusual for him. What is unusual is our leader going out there without
his bow. With the ever-present threat of
Skye’s buzz drones (we call them BD’s for short) and killercopters (KC’s), it
is a strange oversight for him.
At our most recent Council just three days ere
it was agreed, in fact, that the drone threat is increasing, and that the nocturnal
guard ought to be doubled immediately to deal with it. At the same time our resident scientist, Mr Darcy,
has accelerated work to expand our own fleet of automated machine assassins. Such is the state of the arms race in the early
23rd century.
Given these goings on, I can only imagine his
motive is stealth: he means to be swift, and without his horse move invisibly
over rough terrain. If there is a man among us that can outrun a dog, or even a
horse over a long distance, our principal is one of a few from this fortress. His lack of thick warm clothing also suggests some
kind of imminent endurance contest. Additionally he means to allow a certain amount
of superficial hyperthermia so that his chilled outer core will appear mostly invisible
on infrared. I see he isn’t entirely
unarmed; his blade pokes under his flying gray cape like a stiff tail snug in
its sheath. There goes the smartest and fastest of us on foot; the one who
happens also to be the leader and king of my community.
All this unusual activity makes me feel
extremely uneasy. I’m chronically sleep deprived
so I can’t explain it, but I have an inkling that I have something to do with
it.
I push the thought down. I’ll think about it later, when I have the
stomach for more unpleasantness. For the moment I daydream a little…of warm butter
scones and beautiful girls… until my eyes catch on that small figure
accelerating on foot across the frosty plain.
Look at how fast he is! In that blur of fur
covered feet crunching on rime, snapping the dry stalks of grass is an oeuvre
of genetic memory, a tale only he can tell.
Look closely! In that whirlwind
of running is the splattering of blood on pine needles, on wooden doors, on the
silver wings of flying machines. It is all
our great great great grandfathers climbing in fur coats through mountain
passes, holding onto the thundering hooves of horses, persisting against the
silver flash of swords, making walled cities and colossal monuments rise before
holding forth and burying all of it. Then the final administration of the flowery
ruin of every arching steel achievement until we are back to the basic bloody
mosaic once more…with very little ink splattering across volumes of history
books now, the typography turns red, and our world recedes behind lines of
blood. Buckets, rivers, waterfalls and eventually
oceans of the stuff douse rocks, cover coasts, then sink unheralded into piles
of dust and banks of snow…to reveal the innocent countryside. Really? Was it ever that innocent? Look again. Time travels beneath those spinning
feet. Watch the world wash and rub, the color drain out of it as DNA pencil
sketches its first memories over the lift and flow of continents, the rise and
fall of families, of entire bloodlines…from the first days of adaptation when fuming
rocks were plastic and still shaping the red mantle, to the days not so long
ago when the mostly highly evolved men believed that anything goes and nothing
matters. Such a squandering of the
legacy of our hard won lessons, this young king would say. I can tell you the
mood of humanity has darkened since then.
The time of the Great Burning saw our megamachines burnt and ground to
dust, and in their wake, both governments and banks failed. Corporations, the owners of capital, the owners
and drivers of the world’s megamachine, kept running what they could on what
fuel they could find while rust and cold and disruption set in. It all went limping along until age and
softness, power and poverty succumbed to the gathering fury of the mob. For
many years since the business of men is but this: surviving. Once more we discover that the earth is run
by physical laws.
Neither modern nor ancient rituals, neither
money nor any other immortality project makes any difference to the mortality
of men or the marching of ice. Nothing
we do is of any consequence, yet everything we do matters. Now, everything
matters.
To look at the beautiful white views from
these clefts hewn in these tall towers – what you may know as windows – it is
difficult to believe that anything lies beneath of beyond the tranquil façades
of snow. Yet everything is being wiped
out. We do see animals of a particular sort returning, bringing with them
reminders of the nameless, faceless death that lurks in nature. Indeed, life shines again, small and bright,
a pinprick in a vast ocean of darkness. But
when I open my own stricken, terrified eyes to the might of the dark in middle
of the night, I try to hold onto this thought: yet the stars themselves came from the darkness. The
darkness was there first. The darkness
is full of horrors yes, but also magic.
And the mother that gives life to worlds…in time returns and takes it
away.
Thus we have come to the full circle of the
zodiac…where worlds end, and ends meet.
The end is not without irony.
Today the few of us that remain identify again with the animals. Our
fate, even our daily circumstances are tied intimately to these creatures, and
so we acknowledge them, and give them names.
Names for birds, and beasts, and almost every animal that we must
eat. They eat us too of course. Some dark birds with shining dark beaks sit
in the skeletons of trees waiting for us to become corpses and carrion. We
provide regular snacks, thanks to endless battles over territory. To intimidate our neighbours we have an
animal upon our banner. Its creature power, to symbolise the vigour of each of
us, and this House, flies upon black flags attached to the tallest towers. We emblazon the sign of the wolf on the hilts
and blades of swords, we scratch it on rocks, we brand our backs and shoulders
with this insignia.
But even with animal names and animal skins
to keep us warm, the power of men, at least on this planet, is finished. The
megamachines have been laid to waste in the giant graveyard of the world. It is all gone. Well almost.
The drones are a symptom of a vanquished technology that retains some spidery
grip on the hardening iceberg. Mr Darcy,
our resident scientist, has designed coffin like beds for us to sleep through
many more years of winter. But that
assumes we can survive long enough to wipe out our enemies, before they wipe us
out. Once that is achieved, perhaps a
few of us will earn the centuries sleep needed to survive the present age.
We have some power generating capacity, but
not much. Not enough for hot water, or
even a single light bulb at night. We
have no sustained energy for anything like phone calls or radio, although there
is some line-of-sight communication and some satellite technology that remains
operational.
In terms of weapons, we have little more
than swords and bows. Some of the
materials of these weapons are advanced alloys.
We have a few far deadlier weapons, like sniper rifles, and plasma
compasses but very few bullets. Like our
neighbours, we have our own fleet of drones, which we power up via a vast bank
of batteries salvaged from electric cars.
They use a different system, a small nuclear reactor and volcanic
lightning sieves. There is also a little processing power at our disposal, and
some weaponising and harnessing of lightning, but again – not much. Those who did have these capacities became
beacons for marauders, and were soon targeted by swarms of competing factions
desperate to technotopia their survival.
Instead of building capacity, we either buried ours or blew most of it
up. Our master had to find the perfect
balance between hiding our powers, and knowing when to use it. The fact that our fortress stands, and a
community survives here at all is testament to his perfectly attuned intuitions. You will encounter him still; he is an
extraordinary talent in these times. He
has saved our hides and preserved the legacy of his House many times.
I am one of the few who believe that even
his skills are not enough. What we need
is a warm light for all mankind, not just a bright spark. It is clear to me that we are at the end of
the world, and we have run out of time.
For the most part we are washed well beyond the rummaging of ants or
melted watches. Even the power of the
sun is at a low ebb, and thus with nothing to nourish the soil, the power of
men is exhausted. With grim conditions like
these on a planetary scale, we find ourselves with little hope, and little
choice. Our tribe are the last; all we
do is eek out our miserable lives here, one day at a time. Instead of
harvesting crops we try to salvage stuff that was abandoned by long dead
communities. We are the inheritors of pots
and pans and tins and trinkets. If it is not rusted, if the forces of nature do
not claim it or cast it into fields of decay, these small souvenirs are not
machine enough to hold the hounds at bay. Our destinies are lost in these dim
landscapes that shine beneath an anodyne sun.
Our fate lies somewhere upon the cold shadows that bite deeper each day
into our backs. Alone in the dark,
confronted by the flickering candle, we must face up to it in full: We have
committed the sin of hubris, thinking that power comes from ourselves. For this is what man is, and what he always
has been – a creature unable to accept or come to terms with who and what he
is. An animal who defies his very
nature. An animal that believes he is not an animal, certainly not like any
other animal. And yet, how did it come
to this? Not even nature is able to
engineer such massive destruction upon itself. Or does it? Can we adapt, will
we evolve? This is the question that calls to us here at the end at last, when
life hangs like a drop of dew on a dead branch with the night wind approaching.
Chapter
One (Oracle)
Between Landscape and Memory
O
Sweet everlasting Voices be still;
Go to the guards of the heavenly fold
And bid them wander obeying your will
Flame under flame, till Time be no more;
Have you not heard that our hearts are old,
That you call in birds, in wind on the hill,
In shaken boughs, in tide on the shore?
O sweet everlasting Voices be still.
Go to the guards of the heavenly fold
And bid them wander obeying your will
Flame under flame, till Time be no more;
Have you not heard that our hearts are old,
That you call in birds, in wind on the hill,
In shaken boughs, in tide on the shore?
O sweet everlasting Voices be still.
– WB Yeats
[Late afternoon]
Shall I begin?
The iris stiffens, the pupil swells. Somewhere between landscape and memory
a pair of unsympathetic grey eyes register the twirling storm with implacable
patience. The twisting monster materialises out of an extraordinary silence
before advancing toward the hill line where he stands. Though he is in a hurry to catch those ahead
of him, Christopher Ulysses waits.
Oddly enough he seems to filter out the
sound and fury unfolding before him. He seems to siphon through, and beyond the
growing shadow. Given his uncanny capacity to manage both partial attention and
laser-like focus (and alternate seamlessly between the two) it’s clear that he
now searches for something beyond the storm dominating the theatre – and there
it is: a hovering splinter that appears for just a moment before disappearing
again. It is clear that Ulysses is profoundly disturbed, but it is impossible
to tell whether the disappearance of his mother whom he presently pursues (a
woman he is deeply attached to), or whether the flying object in the storm
itself (but not the storm) vexes him.
A dull roar builds along the base of the
side of the hill facing the sea. It
builds and builds until finally the sound of the squall breaks outward and
upward. The pitch overwhelms the hiss
and scratch of frigid coils of sky. To the untrained eye the churning cell
appears to be no more than massive maelstroms catapulting common debris in a
stupendous but mostly harmless aerial ballet… but he, a man with the same fluid
intelligence as the rest of his family, instantly recognises the pink
discharges for volcanic lightning. It
bursts from swilling frag plumes that swell out and invade the upper atmosphere
in curtains of thick impenetrable ink.
The detonations tear at the fabric of the air itself. Each one is hundreds of times more powerful
than ordinary lightning. Each blast is
bright enough to burn away his shadow.
The ruined ground shakes under his
feet. Blinding flashes strobe against
the lines of Ulysses’ face; a visage that belongs to the last of the king’s of
men. The lean man, though he belongs to
a time beyond man’s greatest civilisations, has a medieval look about him. He carries no electrical device, not even a
digital watch. Instead of a phone or a
key, he carries a sword lashed to his hip. His lower legs are wrapped in furs,
his chest – the ribs trying to contain the efficient heaving engine beneath – is
warmed by a thick coat made of the hide of a Black Wolf. Underneath that he
wears a light grey cambric shirt. The
only oddity is a layer of mail in the figure of 8, inch-wide bands of braided
metal looping firmly around his body and at its apex, connecting to the hilt of
his sword via an exotic alloy thread.
Since he remains still vapours collect and
erupt from his smooth white skin. The
four braids coming off the back of his head swing a little against his broad
shoulders as the hands of a stiff wind grab at them. Enormous plumes balloon
out of his mouth but are whipped away by sharp winds surfing along the hill
crest.
He remains uninterested in the storm;
neither is he concerned with the raw power of the blitzkrieg; instead his quick
eyes trace a muddy ditch filled with wolf tracks, then flit to dirty smears
lower down the hillside where men’s boots have trampled white snow to oily
black smears. His keen vision catches on
some World War Three ordinance. Scraps
of brown metal that were once two buzz droids’s litter the grass between two
animal carcasses in the middle distance, then another. The hulls of these drones are salvaged as
scrap and retasked as body-armour. The
round, organic shaping of BD’s in particular can often be made to fit
comfortably around the right sized torso.
As for the flapping hides and smiling skulls of the animals…Ulysses eyes
focus on these…dark red frames both corpses.
The one is a Highland bull, the other a horse from his own fortress. Even
from a distance he recognises the stallion as Hadrada. Both were pulled down by wolves only a few
hours earlier. But now there are no signs of wolves or the party of men
escorting his mother. With the great
storm drawing a vast curtain of blackened, swilling, electrified air over the whole
low valley, his view of the ship is blocked.
It is just then that he whips out his
sword. A four bladed killercopter has
snuck up on him from the windless side of the hill, but before he can smash it
to pieces he notices the small red insignia on its glistening black frame. It’s in the silhouette of the wolf, the mark
of his House. Instead of a small missile
mounted at its centre is a steaming cup of tea.
Now the king sheaths his sword.
When the small black eye of the KC draws
level with Ulysses’s grey eye, he grins, and winks, before taking a sip. The warm honey tastes good in the bitter, dry
air.
There’s a metallic beep before a
disembodied female voice speaks from a device that looks like the tip of a
match; the machine’s speakers.
“Can you see them, my Lord?”
“No, Mr. Darcy they’re behind the frag
storm.”
“So you’ve run into it after all? What will you do now? Will you be heading
back then?”
“No.
I’ll go through it. Make sure
Richard gets a dozen flame baskets to the Memory Towers tonight. And remind him
to stay awake. It’s going to be abnormally cold tonight.”
“Yes sire.
I’ve already raised the conductors, so we’re ready for the storm this
side. It looks like it’s packing a lot
of energy.”
Ulysses says nothing.
“Will you be alright, sire?”
He bends down and allows the wolf-collie to
slurp out the last of his tea. The
lolling tongue eagerly licks out the lukewarm syrup clinging to the bottom of
the cup.
“I’ll see you all tomorrow morning,” he
says, replacing the empty cup and turning his back on the craft. The superlight drone hovers for a moment. The
small camera peeks briefly at the spectacle exploding over the king’s shoulder.
Then the copter turns and beeps. Its autopilot kicks in to soundlessly guide it
along the lie of the land back to its point of origin.
Instead of monitoring the rotations of the
storm, Christopher Ulysses is engaged in his own brand of geomorphometry. He is far more
interested in the manner in which the exhausted landscape rolls away from his
feet towards the coast; he tries to feel its bones, the manner in which its
been hewn by weather and gauged, broken and sculpted by the glaciers of a
previous age of ice. For the topography
will have given them their path; his intuitions – he hopes – may find a shorter,
bolder route across the grain and through its contours.
When he begins to walk towards the storm
his hand clutches at the handle of his sword.
His mind turns briefly to the Greek historian and Athenian General, a
man who speaks eloquently into Ulysses’ present reality.
"But, the bravest are surely those who
have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and
yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it.”
I
search for you… he says, into the ether, even though I know you are already beyond my
reach…
It is less for him an act of bravery than
of despair and desperation. The loss of
a parent into the explicable is a torture perhaps as terrible as the finality
of death itself, but for the opposite reason – alienation festering within the
living.
He speaks to his mother, Kelly Sinclair, a
woman of deep inner convictions and stubborn integrity; she is a tough tousle-haired
haired woman with uncommonly dark, passionate eyes and beautiful lilywhite
skin. She calls to him, but he is the leader of the last black fortress that
towers in these parts. Even though he
moves quickly towards her, his spirit balks:
I
cannot come where you are going. I will
try to find you, and save you, but if I do not, if you make good your getaway you
must save yourself. I have my own road, one you have prepared me well for, and
as a man I must face it with my men in my own way.
He knows only too well the risk of him
going alone in these brutally cold and feral conditions. He has responsibilities to his men, and as
brash as his mother’s errand is, is his any less brash – him going in pursuit
of her without taking anyone with him?
Besides the risks of running into a pack of wolves, or being overcome by
the elements, or being sniped by a killerdrone there is always that risk that
seems worst of all – running into another human being…being ambushed, caught by
surprise by a poisoned loner or gangs of thugs who, if they are hungry enough,
will kill you without a word before eating the flesh from your limbs.
He rationalises his risk-taking on the
premise that the world is an empty place…He’s right. Things have certainly
changed. This western seaboard of the country once known as Scotland is once
more the final remote sanctuary for men (for there are hardly any women, or
children left in the world). But for her
to leave now, a rare woman in a time devoid of the feminine touch…it is an
unnecessary travesty to him. At least
here there is an opportunity to live out the remainder of a life – such as it
is – with a measure of freedom. And he
had the power to give it to her. Here,
in these outermost limits of the Empire that was once Britannia, is now less
than a shadow of the curtain known to men as ‘the West’. In these times there is no West nor East,
there is just the North and the cold star that governs it. There are no tribes
beyond his clan, nothing but frozen waves and rocks tossing under bruised grey
skies. But the world does contain
robbers and wolves that still plunder an exhausted land…
He steps faster over the snow leaving his
own dark marks.
Sometimes,
in spite of everything, we prevail… he says. The
hand not clenching the hilt of his sword remains tightly closed.
He whispers to the woman whom he now knows
he will never see again in his life. His
mother, Kelly Sinclair comes from a very old family. Indeed the line of the dark
haired woman is drawn through one of the oldest families of France, a noble
family, with origins in Normandy France. Originally Saint Claire. But here, in these lands her kin were known
as the Sinclairs… They came here via England when William the Conqueror invaded
England a thousand years ago and changed the destiny of the world.
The irony is not lost on him that his
mother’s name means “bright-headed” or “strife” or “monastery” or
“church”. Nor does the mantra of her
clan, “Commit thy work to God,” fail to sting him. For he knows it is late July and with the
summer solstice imminent, exactly why she and a small party have escaped out
here to conduct a pilgrimage; to sail by boat across the Irish Sea to the 764
metre high Croagh Patrick, where it rises through a thin seam of gold out of
another U-shaped valley, echoing this one, for it too was created by a glacier
during the last Ice Age. She means to
walk it barefoot and call an end to the terrible sufferings, and interminable
winter and wars on this tattered envelope of civilisation. Possibly she means
to expatiate her guilt for raising another son, more troubled, and more
dangerous, who will tear her family and the world even further apart.
She
does not know it is already too late for prayers he
says to the storm.
“They rifle the deep…” Lord Ulysses whispers,
quoting Tacitus. The tall man with long
billowing silver hair strides out over the last page of the history of mankind. He possesses, in his sanctum sanctorum a
library…and one of his books are the Annals…ancient
writing by the hand of Tacitus. A man, a
senator, a historian; Tacitus wrote about Nero, the wars and the changing tides
and fortunes of Rome more than 22 centuries ere.
His steps bring him closer to a roiling
sky, swimming with the debris of exploded spaceships and stables, cars and
shoes, skulls and timepieces all spun together into an eyeless, headless Trojan
Monster.
He unfurls his sword. The lightning immediately seems to disperse
into a sort of plasma. Films of energised light make ghostly veils and
auroras. He holds his sword with its tip
close to the ground. The sword glows
with a vanilla light. The edges of the
sword seem to glow in opposite colors: icecream pink and icecream blue.
It is profoundly sad to him that he should
lose her to the ghosts of her mind, rather than to the practical difficulties
of this world. And then he notices it,
the elephant in the room. The eyeless, mouthless, headless neck sucks, vacuums
and blends. Its ripping unmakes a manmade world, and as it does so it utters a
deafening scream.
Thursday, July 11, 2013
"Uber-atheist Christopher Hitchens got cancer because he blasphemed against God"
“Who else feels Christopher Hitchens
getting terminal throat cancer was God’s revenge for him using his voice to
blaspheme him?. . . It’s just a “coincidence” [that] out of any part of his
body, Christopher Hitchens got cancer in the one part of his body he used
for blasphemy? . . . He’s going to writhe in agony and pain and wither away
to nothing and then die a horrible agonizing death, and THEN comes the real
fun, when he’s sent to HELLFIRE forever to be tortured and set afire.”
Christopher Hitchens quoted this from a Christian blog whilst slowly dying and mostly bedridden in an American hospital. When told that certain congregations would pray for him, Hitchens characteristically replied: "pray for what?"Interestingly the number of Christian groups that elected to pray for him answered that their first priority was to set right his soul for his eternal journey, and the second priority that he might actually be healed from cancer.
What is impressive about Hitchen's brief but brilliant tome is how unsentimental it is, and if anything, there is some sturdy humor in it.
Hitchens points out that if he had, in the final moments of his life, turned to God, factions of the army fighting for his soul would soon have started fighting amongst themselves - Catholics with Protestants, Jews with Gentiles, Muslims with everyone else. A victory for one would have proved a loss for another.
But what is most illuminating for me is the pithy, sentimental, self-serving logic of the quote provided above. Not only is it unspeakably cruel and self-justifying, not only does it ignore its effect on Hitchens' own 'unoffending' children (a word Hitchens' himself uses), but it conveniently circumvents ordinary cause and effect.
Hitchens died before he could finish his book, posthumously published, and titled MORTALITY. He died at 61 of the same thing that afflicted his father, who died in his seventies. Hitchens also takes responsibility for his cancer, by invoking his own lifestyle - he was a successful man with friends on many continents, a man who loved lively conversation after dinner over a glass of Cognac and a cigarette. If one listens to any of Hitchens audiobooks (Mortality for obvious reasons is not narrated by the author) one can hear in his voice not only how well lived it is, but in its eloquence, how tested and studied his wisdom was.
Hitchens was one of those exceptional people whom people who didn't know him felt, when he died, that they missed him. I'm one of them. I'm sad that his voice and his life is no longer here to accompany me through what remains of my life. It is interesting to contrast the gleeful hatred of Christians with a man of such charisma, sense and sensibility. On a recent piece of writing that I came across (article seems too grand a word), the believer opens up with this: The presence of God is surprisingly easy to ‘sense’ and thus prove. It is exactly the sort of self gratifying, self justifying nonsense that gives rise to the absurdity quoted previously. Which is what makes it dangerous. Dangerous and foolish and a disservice to humanity.
It is time believers start opening their eyes and learn to think. Mortality might be a good place to start. It's likely that many weak-minded atheists might even be tempted to pray for themselves whilst counting down the days to certain and eternal death, no doubt Christians, who are weak-minded by definition, would do so by default. It's the mark of not only his intelligence and courage, but his integrity, that Hitchens used his final days to bring us the sort of vital and necessary thinking so sadly lacking in the vast majority of people. Hence the world is in the state it is in. It is what happens when men who call themselves good, call on God to do something so that they can do (and think) nothing.
Christopher Hitchens quoted this from a Christian blog whilst slowly dying and mostly bedridden in an American hospital. When told that certain congregations would pray for him, Hitchens characteristically replied: "pray for what?"Interestingly the number of Christian groups that elected to pray for him answered that their first priority was to set right his soul for his eternal journey, and the second priority that he might actually be healed from cancer.
What is impressive about Hitchen's brief but brilliant tome is how unsentimental it is, and if anything, there is some sturdy humor in it.
Hitchens points out that if he had, in the final moments of his life, turned to God, factions of the army fighting for his soul would soon have started fighting amongst themselves - Catholics with Protestants, Jews with Gentiles, Muslims with everyone else. A victory for one would have proved a loss for another.
But what is most illuminating for me is the pithy, sentimental, self-serving logic of the quote provided above. Not only is it unspeakably cruel and self-justifying, not only does it ignore its effect on Hitchens' own 'unoffending' children (a word Hitchens' himself uses), but it conveniently circumvents ordinary cause and effect.
Hitchens died before he could finish his book, posthumously published, and titled MORTALITY. He died at 61 of the same thing that afflicted his father, who died in his seventies. Hitchens also takes responsibility for his cancer, by invoking his own lifestyle - he was a successful man with friends on many continents, a man who loved lively conversation after dinner over a glass of Cognac and a cigarette. If one listens to any of Hitchens audiobooks (Mortality for obvious reasons is not narrated by the author) one can hear in his voice not only how well lived it is, but in its eloquence, how tested and studied his wisdom was.
Hitchens was one of those exceptional people whom people who didn't know him felt, when he died, that they missed him. I'm one of them. I'm sad that his voice and his life is no longer here to accompany me through what remains of my life. It is interesting to contrast the gleeful hatred of Christians with a man of such charisma, sense and sensibility. On a recent piece of writing that I came across (article seems too grand a word), the believer opens up with this: The presence of God is surprisingly easy to ‘sense’ and thus prove. It is exactly the sort of self gratifying, self justifying nonsense that gives rise to the absurdity quoted previously. Which is what makes it dangerous. Dangerous and foolish and a disservice to humanity.
It is time believers start opening their eyes and learn to think. Mortality might be a good place to start. It's likely that many weak-minded atheists might even be tempted to pray for themselves whilst counting down the days to certain and eternal death, no doubt Christians, who are weak-minded by definition, would do so by default. It's the mark of not only his intelligence and courage, but his integrity, that Hitchens used his final days to bring us the sort of vital and necessary thinking so sadly lacking in the vast majority of people. Hence the world is in the state it is in. It is what happens when men who call themselves good, call on God to do something so that they can do (and think) nothing.
Tuesday, July 09, 2013
What's wrong (and what's right) with my Introduction and first chapter - your thoughts? Attempt #2
Well I've decided to do something different. Again. Since very few writers are able to do a perfect draft of their first book without a second opinion, I've decided to fall in line and do the same. The part I'm struggling with: to get my opening sequence perfect.
I've noticed that even in published books and magazine articles, I sometimes find the material not very compelling, and at times, when evaluating my own writing for the hundredth time, I feel the same way. But is it really bad, and if so, where and what and how to fix it. That's where you come in, with a fresh pair of eyes.
There's already been a clamour of criticism (thanks) which I've tried to take on the chin, turn the other cheek and also, if possible, take it on the nose.
Coming through loud and clear thus far:
- shorten your chapters
- shorten your sentences
- say less more simply rather than too much in long,sophisticated ramblings that are hard to follow
- get to the point: make your theme obvious and get to the crucial theme in your chapter asap
Other valuable comments:
- what time is it, can't you be clearer on the chronology of what's going on? (I've provided time references right at the beginning, hope that helps).
- stick to the same tone - the opening doesn't work (hence I've completely redrafted it).
- keep it interesting but try not to crowd in too much other stuff (I assume other stuff means quotes, memories from history...)
It's tough to find intelligent, literary criticism. So here's my second go to see if I can crowd source some useful feedback. I'm interested to know what knocks off your socks (if anything), what gave you a lump in your throat (maybe not a good thing) and best (actually worst) of all what made you want to click to something else. And so without further ado, here's a reboot, for the crowd this is version 2, but it's unofficially version 96 in the writer's back room. Getting somewhere? You be the judge:
I've noticed that even in published books and magazine articles, I sometimes find the material not very compelling, and at times, when evaluating my own writing for the hundredth time, I feel the same way. But is it really bad, and if so, where and what and how to fix it. That's where you come in, with a fresh pair of eyes.
There's already been a clamour of criticism (thanks) which I've tried to take on the chin, turn the other cheek and also, if possible, take it on the nose.
Coming through loud and clear thus far:
- shorten your chapters
- shorten your sentences
- say less more simply rather than too much in long,sophisticated ramblings that are hard to follow
- get to the point: make your theme obvious and get to the crucial theme in your chapter asap
Other valuable comments:
- what time is it, can't you be clearer on the chronology of what's going on? (I've provided time references right at the beginning, hope that helps).
- stick to the same tone - the opening doesn't work (hence I've completely redrafted it).
- keep it interesting but try not to crowd in too much other stuff (I assume other stuff means quotes, memories from history...)
It's tough to find intelligent, literary criticism. So here's my second go to see if I can crowd source some useful feedback. I'm interested to know what knocks off your socks (if anything), what gave you a lump in your throat (maybe not a good thing) and best (actually worst) of all what made you want to click to something else. And so without further ado, here's a reboot, for the crowd this is version 2, but it's unofficially version 96 in the writer's back room. Getting somewhere? You be the judge:
Introduction
(Scrivener)
Unhappy
is the land that needs a hero
– Galileo
[July 28, 2212, midday]
“Who’s there?”
My eyes travel along the ramparts, to the
archers, but my companion – a woman – directs me instead directly beneath our
station, to the frozen canvas. Far below these towers our master has emerged
without his war horse. He runs from the gate.
The eagle on his arm flaps. The
glossy mane and tail of his black wolf-collie is a dancing comma fluttering
fast across the page. The master’s
silver hair flashes the cold light of brooding clouds back at us, we who watch
from his soaring dark walls. As the great bird vaults into space, each great
beat of its wings drawing it higher into the Highland air, our master seems to
run faster. Unusually he carries no bow
this morning but his blade pokes under his flying gray cape like a stiff tail
snug in its sheath.
In those legs; in that blur of fur covered
feet crunching on frost and dry stalks of grass is a tale only he can
tell. Look closely. In that whirlwind of running is the
splattering of blood on pine needles, on wooden doors, on the silver wings of
flying machines. It is the thundering
hooves of horses, the silver flash of swords, the rise of walled cities and
colossal monuments followed by the flowery ruin of every arching steel
achievement until we are back to the basic bloody mosaic once more…where ink
splattering through the history books turns red, and our world recedes behind
lines of blood dousing rocks, then sinking unheralded into piles of dust and banks
of snow. Time travels beneath those feet
pencil sketching the lift and flow of continents, the rise and fall of
families, of entire bloodlines, from the first days when fuming rocks were
plastic and still shaping the red mantle, to the days not so long ago when men
believed that anything goes and nothing matters. I can tell you the mood of humanity has darkened
since then. The time of the Great
Burning saw both governments and banks fail.
Corporations continued to function until they staggered and succumbed to
the clutches of the mob. For many years since the business of men is but this:
surviving. Once more we discover that
the earth is run by physical laws.
Neither modern nor ancient rituals, neither
money nor any other immortality project makes any difference to the marching of
ice. Nothing we do is of any
consequence, yet everything we do matters. Now, everything matters. Behind the tranquil façade of snow, when
everything is being wiped out, we see the animals return, bringing with them
reminders of the nameless, faceless death that lurks in nature. Life shines again, small and bright, a
pinprick in a vast ocean of darkness. When
I open my own stricken, terrified eyes to the might of the dark in middle of
the night, I try to hold onto this thought: yet
the stars themselves came from the darkness. The
darkness was there first. The darkness
is full of horrors yes, but also magic.
And the mother that gives life to worlds…in time returns and takes it
away.
Thus we have come to the full circle of the
zodiac…where worlds end, and ends meet.
The end is not without irony.
Today the few of us that remain identify again with the animals. Our
fate, even our daily circumstances are tied intimately to these creatures, and
so we acknowledge them, and give them names.
Names for birds, and beasts, and almost every animal that we must
eat. We have even chosen an animal, and
its creature power, to symbolise the vigour of each of us, and this House.
But even with animal names and animal skins
to keep us warm, the power of men, at least on this planet, is finished. The
megamachines have been laid to waste in the giant graveyard of the world. It is all gone. Our tribe are the last; all we do is eek out
our miserable lives, one day at a time. Our destinies are lost in dim
landscapes that shine beneath an anodyne sun.
Our fate lies somewhere upon the cold shadows that bite deeper each day
into our backs. Alone in the dark,
confronted by the flickering candle, we must face up to it in full: We have
committed the sin of hubris, thinking that power comes from ourselves. For this is what man is, and what he always has
been – a creature unable to accept or come to terms with who and what he
is. An animal who defies his very
nature. An animal that believes he is not an animal, certainly not like any
other animal. And yet, how did it come
to this? Not even nature is able to
engineer such massive destruction upon itself? Or does it? This is the question
we are faced with, here at the end at last, when life hangs like a drop of dew
on a dead branch with the night wind approaching.
Chapter
One (Oracle)
Between Landscape and Memory
O
Sweet everlasting Voices be still;
Go to the guards of the heavenly fold
And bid them wander obeying your will
Flame under flame, till Time be no more;
Have you not heard that our hearts are old,
That you call in birds, in wind on the hill,
In shaken boughs, in tide on the shore?
O sweet everlasting Voices be still.
Go to the guards of the heavenly fold
And bid them wander obeying your will
Flame under flame, till Time be no more;
Have you not heard that our hearts are old,
That you call in birds, in wind on the hill,
In shaken boughs, in tide on the shore?
O sweet everlasting Voices be still.
– WB Yeats
[Late afternoon]
Shall I begin?
The iris stiffens, the pupil swells. Somewhere between landscape and memory
a pair of unsympathetic grey eyes register the twirling storm with implacable
patience. The twisting monster materialises out of an extraordinary silence
before advancing toward the hill line where he stands. Though he is in a hurry to catch those ahead
of him, Christopher Ulysses waits.
Oddly enough he seems to tune out the sound
and fury unfolding before him, and seems to look through, and beyond the
growing shadow. He seems to search for everything beyond the storm now
dominating the stage.
It is clear that Ulysses is profoundly
disturbed, but it is impossible to tell whether the disappearance of his mother
whom he presently pursues (a woman he is deeply attached to), or whether
something else, in the storm itself but not the storm, vexes him.
A dull roar builds along the base of the
side of the hill facing the sea. It
builds and builds until finally the sound of the squall breaks outward and
upward. The pitch overwhelms the hiss
and scratch of frigid coils of sky. To the untrained eye the churning cell
appears to be no more than massive maelstroms catapulting common debris in a
stupendous but mostly harmless aerial ballet… but he instantly recognises the
pink discharges for volcanic lightning.
It bursts from swilling frag plumes that swell out and invade the upper
atmosphere in curtains of thick impenetrable ink. The detonations tear at the fabric of the air
itself. Each one is hundreds of times
more powerful than ordinary lightning. Each
blast is bright enough to burn away his shadow.
The ruined ground shakes under his
feet. Blinding flashes strobe against
the lines of Ulysses’ face; a visage that belongs to the last of the king’s of
men. The lean man, though he belongs to
a time beyond man’s greatest civilisations, has a medieval look about him. He carries no electrical device, not even a
digital watch. Instead of a phone or a
key, he carries a sword lashed to his hip. His lower legs are wrapped in furs,
his chest – the ribs trying to contain the efficient heaving engine beneath –
is warmed by a thick coat made of the hide of a Black Wolf. Underneath that he
wears a light grey cambric shirt. The
only oddity is a layer of mail in the figure of 8, inch-wide bands of braided
metal looping firmly around his body and at its apex, connecting to the hilt of
his sword via an exotic alloy thread.
Since he remains still vapours collect and
erupt from his smooth white skin. The
four braids coming off the back of his head swing a little against his broad
shoulders as the hands of a stiff wind grab at them. Enormous plumes balloon
out of his mouth but are whipped away by sharp winds surfing along the hill
crest.
He remains uninterested in the storm;
neither is he concerned with the raw power of the blitzkrieg; instead his quick
eyes trace a muddy ditch filled with wolf tracks, then flit to dirty smears
lower down the hillside where men’s boots have trampled white snow to oily
black smears. His keen vision catches on
a carcass in the middle distance, then another.
Dark red frames both of them. The one is a Highland bull, the other a horse
from his own fortress. Even from a distance he recognises the stallion as
Hadrada. But there are no signs of
wolves, or the party of men escorting his mother. With the great storm drawing a vast curtain
of blackened, swilling, electrified air over the whole low valley, his view of
the ship is blocked.
Instead of monitoring the rotations of the
storm, Christopher Ulysses is more interested in the manner in which the exhausted
landscape rolls away from his feet; how it is sculpted and gauged by the
glaciers of a previous age of ice. For
the lie of the land will have given their path; and his intuitions – he hopes –
may find a shorter route.
When he does he begins to walk towards the
storm, his hand clutching at the handle of his sword. His mind turns briefly to the Greek historian
and Athenian General, a man who speaks into Ulysses’ reality.
"But, the bravest are surely those who
have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and
yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it.”
I
search for you… he says, into the ether, even though I know you are already beyond my
reach…
It is less for him an act of bravery than
of despair and desperation. The loss of
a parent into the explicable, a torture perhaps as terrible as the finality of
death itself, but for the opposite reason – it’s ongoing alienation and uncertainty…
He speaks to his mother, Kelly Sinclair, a tousle-haired
haired woman with dark, passionate eyes and lilywhite skin. She calls to him, but
he is the leader of the last black fortress that towers in these parts.
I
cannot come where you are going. I will
try to find you, and save you, but if I do not, if you make good your getaway you
must save yourself.
He realises the risk of him going alone in
these brutally cold and feral conditions.
He has responsibilities to his men, and as brash as his mother’s errand
is, is his any less brash – him going in pursuit of her without taking anyone
with him? Besides the risks of running
into a pack of wolves, or being overcome by the elements, there is always that risk that seems worst of
all – running into another human being…being ambushed, caught by surprise by a
poisoned loner or gangs of thugs who , if they are hungry enough, will kill you
without a word before eating the flesh from your limbs.
He rationalises his risk-taking on the
premise that the world is an empty place…He’s right. Things have certainly
changed. This western seaboard of the country once known as Scotland is once
more the final remote sanctuary for men (for there are hardly any women, or
children left in the world). But for her
to leave now, a rare women in a time devoid of the feminine touch…it is an
unnecessary travesty to him. At least
here there is an opportunity to live out the remainder of a life – such as it
is – with a measure of freedom. And he
had the power to give it to her. Here,
in these outermost limits of the Empire that was once Britannia, is now less
than a shadow of the curtain known to men as ‘the West’. In these times there is no West and east,
there is just the North and the cold star that governs it. There are no tribes
beyond his clan, nothing but frozen waves and rocks tossing under bruised grey
skies. But the world does contain
robbers, and wolves, that still plunder an exhausted land…
He steps faster over the snow leaving his
own dark marks.
Sometimes,
in spite of everything, we prevail… he says. The
hand not clenching the hilt of his sword remains tightly closed.
He whispers to the woman whom he now knows
he will never see again in his life; his mother, Kelly Sinclair. The line of
the dark haired woman is drawn through one of the oldest families of France, a
noble family, with origins in Normandy France. Originally Saint Claire. But here, in these lands her kin were known
as the Sinclairs… They came here via England when William the Conqueror invaded
England and changed the destiny of the world.
The irony is not lost on him that his
mother’s name means “bright-headed” or “strife” or “monastery” or
“church”. Nor does the mantra of her
clan, “Commit thy work to God,” fail to sting him. For he knows it is late July and with the
summer solstice imminent, exactly why she and a small party have escaped out
here to conduct a pilgrimage; to sail by boat across the Irish Sea to the 764
metre high Croagh Patrick, where it rises out of another U-shaped valley, one
that echoes this one, created by a glacier during the last Ice Age. She means to walk it barefoot and call an end
to the terrible sufferings, and interminable winter and wars on this tattered
envelope of civilisation.
She
does not know it is already too late for prayers he
says to the storm.
“They rifle the deep…” Lord Ulysses whispers,
quoting Tacitus. The tall man with long
billowing silver hair strides out over the last page of the history of
mankind. He possesses, in his sanctum
sanctorum a library…and one of his books are the Annals…ancient writing by the hand of Tacitus. A man, a senator, a historian; Tacitus wrote about Nero, the wars and the changing
tides and fortunes of Rome more than 22 centuries ere.
His steps bring him closer to a roiling
sky, swimming with the debris of spaceships and stables, cars and shoes, skulls
and timepieces all spun together into a Trojan Monster.
It is profoundly sad to him that he should
lose her to the ghosts of her mind, rather than to the practical difficulties
of this world. And then he notices it,
the elephant in the room. The eyeless, mouthless, headless neck sucks, vacuums
and blends, its ripping unmakes a man made world, and as it does so it utters a
deafening scream.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)