SHOOT: It's the simplest thing in the world to prove. You look at bank statements. If millions have been flowing in and out of your personal accounts, that needs to be explained. One would think if you're innocent, what do you have to lose by testifying in court? Surely by remaining 'on the run' you confirm the perception that you have something to hide, because guilty feet run.
It suffices for me to say that I have no intention of leaving Australia. I have no intention of disposing of whatever assets I possess, and I in fact assure whoever requires such assurance that I will not do so.
I challenge him to produce one tittle of evidence to substantiate this outrageous and unsubstantiated piece of drivel.
Thank goodness that the Sydney Morning Herald published one piece of information which must raise a question mark over the suggestion that I single-handedly, if at all, spearheaded a massive scam.
In fact, I state categorically that I am not sitting with millions. I have not amassed some fortune that I have spirited away, and in due course an audit will bear out this statement, if people are still interested in hearing the truth.
If there is no hard proof that they are guilty of any wrongdoing, there is likewise no proof that I have committed fraud.
So why all the focus on me and me alone?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment